...
首页> 外文期刊>Point of care >Finger-Stick Complete Blood Counts Comparison Between Venous and Capillary Blood
【24h】

Finger-Stick Complete Blood Counts Comparison Between Venous and Capillary Blood

机译:静脉血和毛细血管血的手指刺全血细胞计数比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: A complete blood count (CBC) including an automated differential is currently performed on complex analyzers in either central or satellite laboratories. Previously, we reported that CBC measurements determined by Chempaq XBC point-of-care analyzer compare favorably with laboratory-based Beckman Coulter LH750 system. This study describes comparison of capillary finger-stick versus venous blood CBC analyses.Methods: Both finger-stick and venous blood samples obtained simultaneously from 310 patients from 5 different patient clinics were evaluated for white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and differential cell counts. Finger-stick blood samples were collected and analyzed immediately by phlebotomy or nursing staff using a Chempaq XBC analyzer, whereas venous blood was sent to the main laboratory for the analyses on Beckman Coulter LH750 system. Results: There are no significant differences between the mean levels of CBC parameters analyzed between the finger-stick and venous blood: the mean and bias between finger-stick and venous blood for WBCs (7.33, 7.25, 0.08), HGB (13.47, 13.20; 0.27), absolute number of granulocytes (4.96, 4.83; 0.14), lymphocytes (1.70, 1.81; -0.10), and monocytes (0.62, 0.57; 0.05), respectively. There is also a good correlation between finger-stick and venous blood samples except for monocytes: the slope, intercept, and rvalue for WBCs (1.04, -0.24,0.92), HGB (1.13, -1.48, 0.94), number of granulocytes (1.01, 0.08, 0.91), number of lymphocytes (0.87, 0.12, 0.86), and number of monocytes (1.01, 0.04, 0.63), respectively.Conclusions: Finger-stick CBC analyses offer a simple point-of-care in-office test. By following appropriate guidelines, like any flagged or abnormal results, being confirmed by the main laboratory, finger-stick blood testing for CBCs may be useful in remote sites, rural clinics, physician offices, and in developing countries.
机译:背景:目前在中央或卫星实验室的复杂分析仪上执行包括自动差分在内的全血细胞计数(CBC)。先前,我们报道了由Chempaq XBC即时分析仪测定的CBC测量值与基于实验室的Beckman Coulter LH750系统相比具有优势。这项研究描述了毛细管指棒与静脉血CBC分析的比较。方法:同时评估了来自5个不同诊所的310名患者的指棒和静脉血样本的白细胞(WBC),血红蛋白(HGB),和差分细胞计数。采血并由放血术或护理人员使用Chempaq XBC分析仪立即进行分析,而静脉血则被送至主要实验室,以在Beckman Coulter LH750系统上进行分析。结果:在指尖和静脉血之间分析的CBC参数平均水平之间没有显着差异:WBC(7.33,7.25,0.08),HGB(13.47,13.20)的指尖和静脉血之间的平均值和偏差; 0.27),粒细胞的绝对数量(4.96、4.83; 0.14),淋巴细胞(1.70、1.81; -0.10)和单核细胞的绝对数量(0.62、0.57; 0.05)。除单核细胞外,指尖和静脉血样之间也有良好的相关性:白细胞的斜率,截距和右值(1.04,-0.24,0.92),HGB(1.13,-1.48,0.94),粒细胞数(分别为1.01、0.08、0.91),淋巴细胞数量(0.87、0.12、0.86)和单核细胞数量(1.01、0.04、0.63)。结论:指尖CBC分析提供了一个简单的即时诊室测试。通过遵循主要实验室确认的适当指导原则,如任何标记的或异常的结果,对CBC进行的手指刺血检测可能在偏远地区,农村诊所,医师办公室和发展中国家有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号