首页> 外文期刊>Plant Ecology >Seed bank dynamics of the desert cactus Opuntia rastrera in two habitats from the Chihuahuan Desert
【24h】

Seed bank dynamics of the desert cactus Opuntia rastrera in two habitats from the Chihuahuan Desert

机译:奇瓦瓦沙漠两个生境中沙漠仙人掌仙人掌种子的种子库动态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In desert environments the main input to the seed bank of many succulents is the seed rain through zoochory while high levels of granivory by rodents, birds and ants are the main cause of subsequent losses. In the patchy environment of arid lands the characteristics of both processes may vary between habitats causing differences in the recruitment of new genets. To test this hypothesis we used populations of the desert cactus Opuntia rastrera which has different recruitment rates in the two adjacent habitats where it grows. In Opuntia-dominated scrublands (nopaleras, density ca. 4,000 plants/ha) 1 seedling out of 7,000,000 seeds establish, whereas in grasslands (density ca. 100 plants/ha) this ratio is 1:20,000. From 1996 until 1998 the seed rain, seed removal by granivores and seed abundance in the soil were monitored in both habitats. Results showed striking differences in the dynamics of the seed bank of both habitats. Seed rain was 8.5 times bigger in nopaleras than in grasslands. In nopaleras most seeds were removed by rodents while the quantities of seeds removed by rodents, birds and ants in grasslands were similar. One year after dispersal (the time necessary to break seed dormancy) only 6% of original nopalera seeds and 12% of grassland seeds remained. After germination trials only 1% (ca. 15,000 seeds/ha) and 2% (ca. 2,500 seeds/ha) respectively were viable. These differences in the effective seed bank (6 times bigger in nopaleras) can not explain the differences in genet recruitment (which is several orders of magnitude bigger in grasslands). Apparently the between habitat difference in nurse plant availability and in rodent density (which inflict a strong hervibory upon seedlings) can explain the differences in genet recruitment. It is speculated that this between habitat difference in genet recruitment suggests that the species evolved in less extreme environments (e. g. grasslands) than desert scrublands which, in turn, are colonised due to the singular ability of O. rastrera for vegetative propagation.
机译:在沙漠环境中,许多肉质植物种子库的主要输入是通过畜牧业产生的种子雨,而啮齿动物,鸟类和蚂蚁大量食用肉食是随后损失的主要原因。在干旱地区的片刻环境中,两个过程的特征在生境之间可能会有所不同,从而导致新物种的募集方面出现差异。为了验证这一假设,我们使用了沙漠仙人掌仙人掌种群,该种群在其生长的两个相邻生境中具有不同的募集率。在以仙人掌为主导的灌丛中(胭脂虫属,密度约4,000株植物/公顷),在7,000,000种子中建立了1苗,而在草原(密度约100株植物/公顷)中,该比例为1:20,000。从1996年到1998年,在两个生境中都监测了种子雨,食草动物去除种子和土壤中种子的丰度。结果表明,两种生境的种子库动态都存在显着差异。 Nopaleras的种子雨比草原大8.5倍。在胭脂树中,大多数种子被啮齿动物去除,而​​草原上的啮齿动物,鸟类和蚂蚁去除的种子数量相似。散播后一年(打破种子休眠所需的时间),仅剩下原始的Nopalera种子的6%和12%的草原种子。发芽试验后,分别只有1%(约15,000种子/公顷)和2%(约2500种子/公顷)可行。有效种子库中的这些差异(在nopaleras中大6倍)不能解释种系募集的差异(在草原上大几个数量级)。显然,护理植物的可利用性和啮齿动物的密度(对幼苗造成强烈的毒力)之间的生境差异可以解释种系募集的差异。据推测,在种质生境上生境差异之间的差异表明,该物种在比荒漠灌丛更不那么极端的环境(例如草地)中进化,而荒漠灌丛又因牛蛙的无性繁殖能力而定居。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号