...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant Biosystems >A forest typology for monitoring sustainable forest management: the case of European Forest Types.
【24h】

A forest typology for monitoring sustainable forest management: the case of European Forest Types.

机译:监测可持续森林管理的森林类型学:以欧洲森林类型为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sustainable forest management (SFM) is presently widely accepted as the overriding objective for forest policy and practice. Regional processes are in progress all over the world to develop and implement criteria and indicators of SFM. In continental Europe, a set of 35 Pan-European indicators has been endorsed under the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE) to measure progress towards SFM in the 44 countries of the region. The formulation of seven indicators (forest area, growing stock, age structure/diameter distribution, deadwood, tree species composition, damaging agents, naturalness) requires national data to be reported by forest types. Within the vast European forest area the values taken by these indicators show a considerable range of variation, due to variable natural conditions and anthropogenic influences. Given this variability, it is very difficult to grasp the meaning of these indicators when taken out of their ecological background. The paper discusses the concepts behind, and the requirements of, a classification more soundly ecologically framed and suitable for MCPFE reporting than the three (un-informative) classes adopted so far: broadleaved forest, coniferous forest, mixed broadleaved and coniferous forest. We propose a European Forest Types scheme structured into a reasonably higher number of classes, that would improve the specificity of the indicators reported under the MCPFE process and its understanding..
机译:目前,可持续森林管理(SFM)已被广泛接受为森林政策和实践的首要目标。世界各地正在制定和实施可持续森林管理的标准和指标的区域程序。在欧洲大陆,欧洲保护森林部长级会议(MCPFE)批准了一套35项泛欧洲指标,以衡量该地区44个国家在实现可持续森林管理方面的进展。七项指标(森林面积,林木蓄积,年龄结构/直径分布,枯木,树木种类组成,破坏因子,自然性)的制定需要按森林类型报告国家数据。在欧洲广阔的森林地区,由于自然条件的变化和人为因素的影响,这些指标的取值范围变化很​​大。鉴于这种可变性,将这些指标从其生态背景中剔除时,很难把握它们的含义。本文讨论了分类的概念和要求,与迄今为止采用的三种(非信息性)类别(阔叶林,针叶林,阔叶混交林和针叶林)相比,该分类在生态上更合理,更适合MCPFE报告。我们提议将欧洲森林类型计划组织为合理更多的类别,这将提高在MCPFE程序及其理解下报告的指标的特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号