首页> 外文期刊>Planning Practice & Research >Cultural Quarters and Regeneration: The Case of Wolverhampton
【24h】

Cultural Quarters and Regeneration: The Case of Wolverhampton

机译:文化区与复兴:沃尔夫汉普顿案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent decades, cities throughout the UK have increasingly looked to culture-related uses to help bring about regeneration outcomes (Landry et al., 1996). The UK Government has also taken a pro-active stance on the encouragement of cultural industries (Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), 1999), and local authority cultural regeneration strategies have been encouraged (Scottish Executive, 2000). A range of policy approaches has been applied locally, including the widespread designation of 'cultural quarters', often within a broader set of 'city quarters'. However, such approaches to regeneration may be contested, since they may result in negative effects such as erosion of distinctiveness, and there is confusion over the rationale for, and potential of, cultural quarters in particular. This article uses a case study of Wolverhampton's Cultural Quarter to explore the questions of why and how such mechanisms are applied, and what is their potential in terms of delivery of regeneration outcomes. In so doing, the article problematises the notion of cultural quarters, which all too often forms part of an under-theorised orthodoxy of practice, transmitted by a process of serial replication. The article is structured as follows. First, conceptual frameworks relevant to city quartering, culture-led regeneration and 'cultural quarters' are considered; second, a case study of Wolverhampton's Cultural Quarter is set out; third, an analysis of the critical issues and problems is provided; and finally, broad conclusions are suggested, of relevance to policy and practice elsewhere.
机译:近几十年来,英国各地的城市越来越多地寻求与文化相关的用途,以帮助实现再生成果(Landry等,1996)。英国政府还对鼓励文化产业采取了积极的态度(文化,媒体和体育部(DCMS),1999),并鼓励了地方政府的文化复兴战略(Scottish Executive,2000)。当地已采用了一系列政策方法,包括通常在更广泛的“城市区”中广泛使用的“文化区”。但是,这种再生方法可能会引起争议,因为它们可能导致负面影响,例如侵蚀独特性,尤其是对文化区的基本原理和潜力产生混淆。本文以伍尔弗汉普顿文化区为例,探讨了为何以及如何应用这种机制的问题,以及在提供再生成果方面的潜力。这样一来,本文就对文化区的概念提出了质疑,文化区的概念经常是通过系列复制过程传播的,理论不足的实践正统的一部分。这篇文章的结构如下。首先,考虑与城市居住区,以文化为主导的复兴和“文化区”有关的概念框架;第二,以伍尔弗汉普顿文化区为例。第三,对关键问题进行分析。最后,提出了与其他政策和实践有关的广泛结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号