...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiology & behavior >Varied effects of conventional antiepileptics on responding maintained by negative versus positive reinforcement.
【24h】

Varied effects of conventional antiepileptics on responding maintained by negative versus positive reinforcement.

机译:常规抗癫痫药对应答的不同作用由负增强与正增强维持。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyzed the effects of four conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) - carbamazepine (CBZ), ethosuximide (ETH), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA) - on operant behavior maintained by negative or positive reinforcement contingencies. Rats were trained to lever press on a free-operant avoidance schedule or variable-interval (VI) schedule of appetitive reinforcement. Dose-effect functions were separately established on each reinforcement contingency for CBZ (12.5-100 mg/kg), ETH (25-200 mg/kg), PHT (12.5-50 mg/kg), and VPA (50-400 mg/kg). CBZ and PHT reduced responding on free-operant avoidance and VI appetitive reinforcement tasks, with positively reinforced behavior reduced at lower drug dosages than negatively reinforced responding. ETH and VPA reduced responding on the VI appetitive reinforcement task, but did not alter behavior maintained on the free-operant avoidance schedule. Our results suggest that conventional AEDs vary in their effect on operant behavior, depending on the type of reinforcement process maintaining responding.
机译:我们分析了四种传统的抗癫痫药(AED)-卡马西平(CBZ),乙巯乙酰亚胺(ETH),苯妥英钠(PHT)和丙戊酸盐(VPA)-对负性或正性紧急事件维持的操作者行为的影响。对大鼠进行了训练,使其按自由操作的避让时间表或可变间隔(VI)的食欲增强时间表进行压力训练。针对CBZ(12.5-100 mg / kg),ETH(25-200 mg / kg),PHT(12.5-50 mg / kg)和VPA(50-400 mg / kg)的每种增强意外情况分别建立剂量​​效应功能公斤)。 CBZ和PHT减少了对自由操作回避和VI竞争性强化任务的反应,在药物剂量较低的情况下,积极强化的行为比消极强化的响应减少。 ETH和VPA减少了对VI竞争性强化任务的响应,但没有改变自由操作者回避时间表上维持的行为。我们的结果表明,传统的AED对操作行为的影响会有所不同,具体取决于维持响应的加固过程的类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号