首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction: a nationwide case-control study.
【24h】

Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction: a nationwide case-control study.

机译:抗糖尿病治疗和心肌梗死的住院风险:一项全国病例对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: Data on cardiovascular risk associated with different types of antidiabetic treatments are sparse and conflicting. We examined the risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction (MI) among patients treated with sulfonylureas, metformin, insulin, any combination and no antidiabetic pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Using nationwide registries, we conducted a population-based nested case-control study among all patients with type 2 diabetes in Denmark and identified all patients hospitalised with a first-time MI and age- and gender-matched non-MI controls in the period 1996-2004. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of MI according to type of antidiabetic treatment, adjusted for potential confounding factors using patients treated with sulfonylureas as the reference group. RESULTS: A total of 10,616 type 2 diabetic cases hospitalised with MI and 90,697 type 2 diabetic non-MI controls were available for analysis. We found a lower risk of hospitalisation with MI among users of metformin (adjusted OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.78-0.95), insulin (adjusted OR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.86-0.99) and among patients not receiving any antidiabetic pharmacotherapy (adjusted OR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.71-0.79) compared with users of sulfonylureas. Users of any combination had similar risk as users of sulfonylureas (adjusted OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.92-1.06). We found no differences between individual sulfonylureas, and glycaemic control and lipid profile had only minor impact on the risk estimates in subanalyses including HbA(1c) , cholesterol and triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that sulfonylureas may be associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation with MI.
机译:目的:与不同类型的抗糖尿病治疗相关的心血管疾病风险的数据稀疏且相互矛盾。我们检查了接受磺酰脲类,二甲双胍,胰岛素,任何组合和未使用抗糖尿病药物治疗的患者中发生心肌梗塞(MI)的住院风险。方法:我们使用全国性的登记系统,在丹麦的所有2型糖尿病患者中进行了基于人群的巢式病例对照研究,并确定了所有住院的初诊心梗患者以及年龄和性别匹配的非心梗对照患者。 1996年至2004年。我们根据抗糖尿病治疗的类型估算了MI的优势比(OR),并使用磺脲类药物治疗的患者作为参考组对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。结果:共有10,616例2型糖尿病合并MI的住院患者和90,697例2型糖尿病非MI对照可用于分析。我们发现二甲双胍(调整后的OR = 0.86,95%CI:0.78-0.95),胰岛素(调整后的OR = 0.92,95%CI:0.86-0.99)和未接受任何降糖药的患者中发生MI的住院风险较低与磺酰脲类药物使用者相比,进行药物治疗(调整后的OR = 0.75,95%CI:0.71-0.79)。任何组合的使用者的风险都与磺酰脲类使用者相似(调整后的OR = 0.99,95%CI:0.92-1.06)。我们发现各个磺酰脲类之间没有差异,血糖控制和血脂水平对包括HbA(1c),胆固醇和甘油三酸酯在内的亚分析中的风险估计影响很小。结论:我们的发现为磺酰脲类药物可能增加心肌梗死的住院风险提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号