...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >UK drug analysis prints and anaesthetic adverse drug reactions.
【24h】

UK drug analysis prints and anaesthetic adverse drug reactions.

机译:英国药物分析印刷品和麻醉药不良反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: Anaesthetic drugs were selected from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Drug Analysis Prints in order to determine the number and types of reported reactions and associated mortality. METHODS: The chosen drug groups were the intravenous induction agents, the neuromuscular blocking drugs and neostigmine, the inhalational anaesthetic agents and nitrous oxide, local anaesthetic agents and a selection of analgesics agents, naloxone and midazolam and its antagonist flumazenil. From each drug file, the number and type of reactions were analysed. Mortality was calculated as a percentage of the number of deaths against patient reports. RESULTS: A total of 11,199 reactions were analysed from 6603 patients of whom 620 (9%) died. Few drug records reported reactions from multiple constituent formulations. The majority of reactions were not allergic. The highest mortality was in the inhalational anaesthetic group. Although the greatest number of fatal events was associated with halothane, this drug is no longer used. Nevertheless the percentage remains high because cardiovascular mortality is still being reported. Local anaesthetic use was associated with the smallest percentage mortality (3%). The highest reported number of reactions was associated with the intravenous induction agents and idiosyncratic neurological and peripheral vascular reactions were linked with the use of etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of allergic reactions was low. The data demonstrate that induction of anaesthesia presents the highest risk of adverse drug reaction; there is also mortality from newer drugs for example, desflurane, remifentanil as well as from drugs for which there is no alternative, for example, suxamethonium.
机译:目的:从药物和保健产品监管机构药物分析印刷品中选择麻醉药,以确定所报告的反应的数量和类型以及相关的死亡率。方法:选择的药物类别为静脉内诱导剂,神经肌肉阻滞药和新斯的明,吸入麻醉药和一氧化二氮,局麻药以及选择的镇痛药,纳洛酮和咪达唑仑及其拮抗剂氟马西尼。从每个药物档案中,分析反应的数量和类型。死亡率是根据患者报告中死亡人数的百分比计算的。结果:对6603例患者进行了11,199例反应分析,其中620例(9%)死亡。很少有药物记录报道来自多种成分配方的反应。大多数反应不是过敏的。死亡率最高的是吸入麻醉组。尽管致命事件的最大数量与氟烷有关,但不再使用该药物。然而,由于仍在报告心血管疾病死亡率,因此该百分比仍然很高。局部麻醉药的使用与最低的死亡率百分比有关(3%)。报道的最高反应数量与静脉内诱导剂有关,特异神经和外周血管反应与依托咪酯的使用有关。结论:过敏反应的报道很少。数据表明,麻醉诱导药物不良反应的风险最高。还有新药(例如地氟醚,瑞芬太尼)以及没有替代品的药物(例如,丁二铵)的死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号