...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Differential Sensitivities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Spike Polypeptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and SARS Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein ELISA for Serodiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus Pneumonia
【24h】

Differential Sensitivities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Spike Polypeptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and SARS Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein ELISA for Serodiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus Pneumonia

机译:严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)冠状病毒穗状多肽酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和SARS冠状病毒核衣夹蛋白ELISA对SARS冠状病毒肺炎的血清学诊断的敏感性差异

获取原文
           

摘要

The use of recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nucleocapsid protein (N) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based antibody and antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV infections have been widely reported. However, no recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein (S)-based ELISA is currently available. In this article, we describe the problems and solutions of setting up the recombinant SARS-CoV S-based ELISA for antibody detection. The SARS-CoV S-based immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG ELISAs were evaluated and compared with the corresponding N-based ELISA for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV pneumonia, using sera from 148 healthy blood donors who donated blood 3 years ago as controls and 95 SARS-CoV pneumonia patients in Hong Kong. Results obtained by the recombinant S (rS)-based IgG ELISA using the regenerated S prepared by dialysis with decreasing concentrations of urea or direct addition of different coating buffers, followed by addition of different regeneration buffer, identified 4 M urea and 1 M sarcosine for plate coating and no regeneration buffer as the most optimal conditions for antibody detection. The specificities of the S-based ELISA for IgG and IgM detection were 98.6% and 93.9%, with corresponding sensitivities of 58.9% and 74.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of the rN IgG ELISA (94.7%) is significantly higher than that of the rS IgG ELISA (P < 0.001), whereas the sensitivity of the rS IgM ELISA is significantly higher than that of the rN IgM ELISA (55.2%) (P < 0.01). An ELISA for detection of IgM against S and N could be more sensitive than one that detects IgM against N alone for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV pneumonia.
机译:广泛报道了基于重组严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)核衣壳蛋白(N)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的抗体和抗原测试用于诊断SARS-CoV感染。但是,目前尚无基于重组SARS-CoV穗蛋白(S)的ELISA。在本文中,我们描述了建立用于抗体检测的重组SARS-CoV S基ELISA的问题和解决方案。使用来自3年前献血的148名健康献血者的血清,对SARS-CoV S免疫球蛋白M(IgM)和IgG ELISA进行了评估,并与相应的N基ELISA进行了血清学诊断,比较了相应的N-ELISA香港共有95名SARS冠状病毒性肺炎患者。通过重组S(rS)的IgG ELISA,使用通过降低尿素浓度或直接添加不同包被缓冲液进行透析而制备的再生S的结果,鉴定出4 M尿素和1 M肌氨酸板涂层和无再生缓冲液是检测抗体的最佳条件。基于S的ELISA对IgG和IgM检测的特异性分别为98.6%和93.9%,相应的灵敏度分别为58.9%和74.7%。 rN IgG ELISA的敏感性(94.7%)显着高于rS IgG ELISA的敏感性( P <0.001),而rS IgM ELISA的敏感性显着高于rN IgG IgM ELISA(55.2%)( P <0.01)。用于检测针对S和N的IgM的ELISA可能比仅检测针对N的IgM的SARS-CoV肺炎的血清诊断的ELISA灵敏度更高。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号