首页> 外文期刊>Public Policy and Administration Research >Would For-profit benefit rather than destroy Non-profit? Balance in China’s Social Entrepreneurship Management
【24h】

Would For-profit benefit rather than destroy Non-profit? Balance in China’s Social Entrepreneurship Management

机译:营利性组织会受益而不是消灭非营利组织吗?中国社会企业家管理的平衡

获取原文
       

摘要

Theory and practice of social entrepreneurship are both growing rapidly and attracting increasing attention from a number of different domains, such as non-profits, for-profits, and the public sectors. Social entrepreneurship differs from traditional understanding of business entrepreneurship or non-profit organizations. Social entrepreneurs face barriers to achieve success both in business and social sector which get into more challenges. Facing social entrepreneurship failures, first, we isolated for-profit and non-profit compositions to better our understanding of internal processes. Then the primary question is whether for-profit activities would benefit non-profit or destroy the social purpose. We established a hypotheses framework by case studies which identified three tensions between for-profit and non-profit: T1. Ambidexterity: Differentiation or Integration; T2. Resource Allocation: Short-term versus Long-term; T3. Social Changes: Stability versus Adaptability. In this article, three identified tensions from social entrepreneurship practice would give theoretical structure to public field and increase better performance.
机译:社会企业家精神的理论和实践都在迅速发展,并吸引了许多不同领域的关注,例如非营利组织,营利性组织和公共部门。社会企业家精神不同于对企业企业家精神或非营利组织的传统理解。社会企业家面临着在商业和社会领域取得成功的障碍,这面临着更多的挑战。面对社会企业家精神的失败,首先,我们隔离了营利性和非营利性组织,以更好地了解内部流程。然后,主要问题是营利性活动是否会使非营利性受益或破坏社会目的。我们通过案例研究建立了一个假设框架,该框架确定了营利性和非营利性之间的三种张力:T1。双性:分化或整合; T2。资源分配:短期与长期; T3。社会变革:稳定与适应。在本文中,从社会企业家实践中发现的三种紧张关系将为公共领域提供理论结构并提高绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号