首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >Free Will, Subjectivity and the Physics of the Nervous System
【24h】

Free Will, Subjectivity and the Physics of the Nervous System

机译:自由意志,主观性与神经系统物理学

获取原文
       

摘要

We want to stress the irreducibility of subjectivity to a pure physical process and, related to this the existence of an actual free will. A discussion on the existence of free will goes back at least to the Middle Ages. Today however the problem has been considered again in the framework of Neurophysiology and in connection with specific experiments. The problem is related to reductionism, i.e. the claim that subjectivity could be considered an epiphenomenon of the cerebral processes, the argument being that all our sensorial perceptions, the control of movement, our states of wakefulness or of unconsciousness can be related to the activation or to the block of specific areas of our cerebral cortex. In the frame of this conception free will is denied essentially on the basis of physical determinism. In contrast to such attitude, we argue that experiences like consciousness of ourselves, of a personal identity or even simply of qualia completely escape from concepts of physical nature. As a consequence of the specific epistemological choice, they cannot even be expressed in the language of Physics. The point of view of Physics and introspection appear both essential but complementary and irreducible one to the other; any attempt to do so brings to unresolvable aporias. Specifically on free will, we note that our nervous system is a complex mesoscopic system, for an understanding of its occurrences, reference to Quantum Theory is essential. As consequence, its reaction to any external input is not uniquely determined but is open to a plurality of responses for which only a distribution of probability is given. Physics does not provide any cause for one response rather than another, while we experience our response to be intentional. Quantum Mechanics seems to offer the logical space to reconcile Physics with introspection. Some basic notions on the structure and working of neurons and of the central nervous systems are also recalled, Liebet’s experiments on retarded awareness and the role of free will in the knowledge process are discussed.
机译:我们要强调主观性对纯粹的物理过程的不可还原性,并与此相关的是存在实际的自由意志。关于自由意志存在的讨论至少可以追溯到中世纪。但是今天,在神经生理学的框架内以及与特定的实验相关的问题已被再次考虑。这个问题与还原主义有关,即声称主观性可以被认为是大脑过程的现象,这种论点是我们所有的感官知觉,运动的控制,我们的清醒或无意识状态都可以与激活或到我们大脑皮层特定区域的阻滞。在这个概念的框架中,自由意志基本上是基于物理决定论而被否定的。与这种态度相反,我们认为,像我们自己的意识,个人身份乃至仅仅是Qualia的体验完全脱离了自然界的概念。由于特定的认识论选择,它们甚至无法用物理学的语言表达。物理学和自省的观点似乎是必不可少的,但又是相互补充和不可简化的。任何尝试都会导致无法解决的视差。特别是在自由意志上,我们注意到我们的神经系统是一个复杂的介观系统,为了理解其发生,引用量子理论是必不可少的。结果,其对任何外部输入的反应不是唯一确定的,而是对多个响应开放,对于这些响应,仅给出了概率分布。当我们体验到我们的响应是故意的时,物理学不会为一种响应提供任何原因,而不会为另一响应提供任何原因。量子力学似乎为调和物理与自省提供了逻辑空间。还回顾了有关神经元和中枢神经系统的结构和工作的一些基本概念,并讨论了Liebet关于智力低下和自由意志在知识过程中的作用的实验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号