...
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Business and Management >Internal Control Audit Fee and Internal Control Audit Quality—Evidence from Integrated Audits
【24h】

Internal Control Audit Fee and Internal Control Audit Quality—Evidence from Integrated Audits

机译:内部控制审计费用和内部控制审计质量-来自综合审计的证据

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Based on the internal control auditing system in China, this paper studies the relationship between internal control audit fees and internal control audit quality. Using the 2011-2016 A-share listed company data test, it is found that under the control of other possible conditions, the higher the internal control audit fee and its proportion, the lower the probability of being issued anon-standard internal control audit opinion, which means that the relatively high internal control audit fee may be paid by companies to purchase more favorable internal control audit opinions. Further, the above result is found to be more significant in non-state-owned, relatively smaller companies, and clients whose total audit fees are higher. In general, from the research conclusions of this paper, the high internal control audit fees can be a form of damage to the independence and quality of internal control audit. The results have certain guiding significance for policy makers to further improve the internal control auditing system and regulate the disclosure of internal control audit fees, and also for the decision-making of auditors and listed companies.
机译:本文基于我国内部控制审计制度,研究了内部控制审计费用与内部控制审计质量之间的关系。通过2011- 2016年A股上市公司数据检验,发现在其他可能条件的控制下,内部控制审计费用及其所占比例越高,发布非标准内部控制审计意见的可能性越低。 ,这意味着公司可能会支付较高的内部控制审计费用,以购买更有利的内部控制审计意见。此外,在非国有,规模相对较小的公司以及总审计费用较高的客户中,发现上述结果更为重要。总体而言,从本文的研究结论来看,高额的内部控制审计费用可能是损害内部控制审计独立性和质量的一种形式。该结果对决策者进一步完善内部控制审计制度,规范内部控制审计费用的披露,对审计师和上市公司的决策具有一定的指导意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号