首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Evaluating the efficacy of knowledge-transfer interventions on animal health knowledge of rural villagers in central Ethiopia: A cluster-randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Evaluating the efficacy of knowledge-transfer interventions on animal health knowledge of rural villagers in central Ethiopia: A cluster-randomised controlled trial

机译:评价知识转移干预措施对埃塞俄比亚中部农村村民动物健康知识的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of several knowledge-transfer interventions about donkey health, utilising a cluster-randomised controlled trial (c-RCT), on the long-term knowledge change (approximately six months post intervention) of rural Ethiopian villagers. Knowledge transfer interventions included: an audio programme, a village meeting and a diagrammatic hand-out, which were also compared to both a control group, which received no intervention. All interventions addressed identical learning objectives. Thirty-two villages were randomly selected and interventions randomly assigned to blocks of eight villages. All participants in a village received the same intervention, and knowledge levels were assessed by questionnaire administration both pre and post intervention. Data analysis included multilevel linear and logistic regression models (allowing for clustering of individuals within villages) to evaluate the change in knowledge between the different knowledge-transfer interventions, and to look at other factors associated with change in knowledge. A total of 516 randomly selected participants completed pre-intervention questionnaires, 476 undertook a post-dissemination questionnaire approximately six months later, a follow-up response rate of 92%. All interventions significantly improved the overall knowledge score on the post intervention questionnaire compared to the control group, with the diagrammatic hand-out (coefficient (coef) 10.0, S.E. = 0.5) and the village meeting (coef 8.5, S.E = 0.5) having a significantly greater impact than the audio programme (coef 4.0, S.E = 0.5). There were differences in learning across interventions, learning objectives, age and education levels of the participants. Participants with higher levels of formal education had greater knowledge change but this varied across interventions. In conclusion, knowledge of donkey health was substantially increased by a diagrammatic hand-out and the impact of this simple, low-cost intervention should be further evaluated in other communities in low-income countries. This study should assist in the design and development of effective knowledge-transfer materials for adult learning for rural villagers in low-income countries.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用聚类随机对照试验(c-RCT),评估几种有关驴健康的知识转移干预措施对农村埃塞俄比亚人的长期知识变化(干预后大约六个月)的有效性。村民。知识转移干预措施包括:音频计划,村民会议和图表分发,还与没有接受干预措施的对照组进行了比较。所有干预措施都针对相同的学习目标。随机选择了32个村庄,并将干预措施随机分配给8个村庄的街区。村庄中的所有参与者都接受了相同的干预,干预前和干预后通过问卷管理评估了知识水平。数据分析包括多级线性和逻辑回归模型(允许在村庄内对个人进行聚类),以评估不同知识转移干预措施之间的知识变化,并查看与知识变化相关的其他因素。总共516名随机选择的参与者完成了干预前问卷调查,大约六个月后有476人进行了传播后问卷调查,随访回应率为92%。与对照组相比,所有干预措施均显着提高了干预后调查问卷的整体知识得分,图表上的讲义(系数(系数)10.0,SE = 0.5)和村民会议(系数8.5,SE = 0.5)具有比音频程序产生的影响要大得多(coef 4.0,SE = 0.5)。参与者的干预措施,学习目标,年龄和受教育程度之间的学习存在差异。接受正规教育水平较高的参与者的知识变化更大,但这在干预措施中有所不同。总之,通过图表分发,大大提高了驴的健康知识,这种简单,低成本的干预措施的影响应在低收入国家的其他社区进一步评估。这项研究应有助于设计和开发有效的知识转移材料,供低收入国家的农村村民进行成人学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号