首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Global Health >Effects of community health interventions on under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau (EPICS): a cluster-randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Effects of community health interventions on under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau (EPICS): a cluster-randomised controlled trial

机译:社区卫生干预措施对几内亚比绍农村地区5岁以下儿童死亡率的影响(EPICS):一项整群随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

SummaryBackground Evidence suggests that community-based interventions that promote improved home-based practices and care-seeking behaviour can have a large impact on maternal and child mortality in regions where rates are high. We aimed to assess whether an intervention package based on the {WHO} Integrated Management of Childhood Illness handbook and community mobilisation could reduce under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau, where the health service infrastructure is weak. Methods We did a non-masked cluster-randomised controlled trial (EPICS) in the districts of Tombali and Quinara in Guinea-Bissau. Clusters of rural villages were stratified by ethnicity and distance from a regional health centre, and randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention or control using a computerised random number generator. Women were eligible if they lived in one of the clusters at baseline survey prior to randomisation and if they were aged 15–49 years or were primary caregivers of children younger than 5 years. Their children were eligible if they were younger than 5 years or were liveborn after intervention services could be implemented on July 1, 2008. In villages receiving the intervention, community health clubs were established, community health workers were trained in case management, and traditional birth attendants were trained to care for pregnant women and newborn babies, and promote facility-based delivery. Registered nurses supervised community health workers and offered mobile clinic services. Health centres were not improved. The control group received usual services. The primary outcome was the proportion of children dying under age 5 years, and was analysed in all eligible children up to final visits to villages between Jan 1 and March 31, 2011. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN52433336. Findings On Aug 30, 2007, we randomly assigned 146 clusters to intervention (73 clusters, 5669 women, and 4573 children) or control (73 clusters, 5840 women, and 4675 children). From randomisation until the end of the trial (last visit by June 30, 2011), the intervention clusters had 3093 livebirths and the control clusters had 3194. 6729 children in the intervention group and 6894 in the control group aged 0–5 years on July 1, 2008, or liveborn subsequently were analysed for mortality outcomes. 311 (4·6%) of 6729 children younger than 5 years died in the intervention group compared with 273 (4·0%) of 6894 in the control group (relative risk 1·16 [95% {CI} 0·99–1·37]). Interpretation Our package of community-based interventions did not reduce under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau. The short timeframe and other trial limitations might have affected our results. Community-based health promotion and basic first-line services in fragile contexts with weak secondary health service infrastructure might be insufficient to reduce child deaths. Funding Effective Intervention.
机译:总结背景证据表明,以社区为基础的干预措施可促进改善家庭习惯和寻求护理的行为,对高发地区的孕产妇和儿童死亡率产生重大影响。我们旨在评估基于{WHO}儿童疾病综合管理手册和社区动员的一揽子干预措施是否可以降低卫生服务基础设施薄弱的几内亚比绍农村地区5岁以下儿童的死亡率。方法我们在几内亚比绍的Tombali和Quinara地区进行了非掩蔽的集群随机对照试验(EPICS)。根据种族和距区域卫生中心的距离,对乡村集群进行分层,并使用计算机随机数发生器将其随机分配(1:1)进行干预或控制。如果妇女在随机分组之前居住在基线调查中的某一类群中,并且年龄在15-49岁之间,或者是5岁以下儿童的主要照顾者,则符合资格。如果他们的孩子小于5岁,或者在2008年7月1日可以实施干预服务后才出生,则符合资格。在接受干预的村庄中,建立了社区保健俱乐部,对社区保健工作者进行了案例管理培训和传统分娩培训了服务员照顾孕妇和新生婴儿,并促进了分娩。注册护士对社区卫生工作者进行监督,并提供流动诊所服务。卫生中心没有得到改善。对照组接受常规服务。主要结局是5岁以下儿童的死亡比例,对所有合格儿童进行分析,直到2011年1月1日至2011年3月31日最后一次访问村庄为止。该试验在ISRCTN进行了注册,编号ISRCTN52433336。研究结果2007年8月30日,我们随机分配了146个聚类进行干预(73个聚类,5669名女性和4573名儿童)或对照组(73个聚类,5840名女性和4675名儿童)。从随机分组到试验结束(最后一次访问是在2011年6月30日之前),干预组的3例活产婴儿中有3003例,对照组的3194例中有7194例儿童。对照组中6月份0-5岁的6894例儿童。随后对2008年1月1日或活产婴儿的死亡率进行分析。干预组6729名5岁以下儿童中有311人(4·6%)死亡,而对照组6894名儿童中有273名(4·0%)有对照组(相对风险1·16 [95%{CI} 0·99– 1·37])。解释我们基于社区的干预措施并未降低几内亚比绍农村地区5岁以下儿童的死亡率。较短的时间范围和其他试用限制可能会影响我们的结果。在脆弱的情况下,基于社区的健康促进和基本的一线服务,二级卫生服务基础设施薄弱,可能不足以减少儿童死亡。资助有效的干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号