...
首页> 外文期刊>World trade review >Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention: Rising Protectionism in Australia
【24h】

Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention: Rising Protectionism in Australia

机译:规避和反规避:澳大利亚日益上升的贸易保护主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The article discusses circumvention and anti-circumvention in international trade with a focus on Australia's anti-circumvention mechanism and in particular the first anti-circumvention investigation in Australia. It identifies the major issues relating to circumvention and anti-circumvention in the GATT/WTO negotiations which have led to the failure of WTO members to conclude uniform rules on anti-circumvention. The article argues that multilateral anti-circumvention rules are necessary to standardize national anti-circumvention laws and practice and discipline unilateral use of anti-circumvention measures. The article further argues that Australia's anti-circumvention law and practice, as reflected in its first anti-circumvention investigation, may have violated WTO rules and is likely to lead to increasing protectionism to cost of WTO members and Australia's FTA trading partners. Australia's unjustified use of anti-circumvention measures is unlikely to foster the development of its import-competing industries and may provoke retaliation by other countries.
机译:本文讨论了国际贸易中的规避和反规避,重点是澳大利亚的反规避机制,尤其是澳大利亚的首次反规避调查。它确定了关贸总协定/世贸组织谈判中与规避和反规避有关的主要问题,这些主要问题导致世贸组织成员未能制定统一的反规避规则。该文章认为,多边反规避规则对于规范国家反规避法律和实践以及规范单方面使用反规避措施是必要的。文章进一步指出,澳大利亚的反规避法律和实践,正如其首次反规避调查所反映的那样,可能违反了WTO规则,并有可能导致贸易保护主义增加,增加了WTO成员和澳大利亚FTA贸易伙伴的成本。澳大利亚不合理地使用反规避措施不太可能促进其进口竞争产业的发展,并可能引起其他国家的报复。

著录项

  • 来源
    《World trade review》 |2016年第3期|495-522|共28页
  • 作者

    Zhou Weihuan;

  • 作者单位

    Univ New S Wales, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号