...
首页> 外文期刊>World intellectual property report >German Supreme Court Rolex Trademark Ruling Could Cost Business
【24h】

German Supreme Court Rolex Trademark Ruling Could Cost Business

机译:德国最高法院劳力士商标裁决可能会使企业蒙受损失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A recent ruling by the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) permitting trademark holders to block the unauthorized use of their brand names in third party Google advertisements could prove to be a double-edged sword for business given that rights holders must be careful to exempt lawful third party requests or else face penalties for competition law violations, attorneys told Bloomberg BNA on May 5. In the decision, delivered on March 12 (Az. I ZR 188/ 13), BGH judges ruled that trademark holders' use of Google's "general trademark complaint" tool, which automatically blocks any use of a protected brand in Google advertisements, was "legitimate". However, the court also stipulated that, in accordance with principles of fair competition, the trademark holder must grant consent to third parties if their proposed advert does not infringe intellectual property rights.
机译:德国联邦法院(BGH)最近的一项裁决,允许商标持有人禁止在第三方Google广告中未经授权使用其品牌名称,这可能证明是商业的双刃剑,因为权利持有人必须谨慎免除律师在5月5日告诉彭博社(Bloomberg BNA),合法的第三方要求否则将面临违反竞争法的处罚。在3月12日(Az。I ZR 188/13)作出的裁决中,BGH法官裁定商标持有人使用Google的“常规商标投诉”工具是“合法的”,该工具会自动阻止在Google广告中使用受保护品牌。但是,法院还规定,根据公平竞争的原则,如果商标持有人的拟议广告没有侵犯知识产权,则商标持有人必须同意第三方的同意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号