...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >Banking and Interest Rates in Monetary Policy Analysis: A Quantitative Exploration
【24h】

Banking and Interest Rates in Monetary Policy Analysis: A Quantitative Exploration

机译:货币政策分析中的银行与利率:定量探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper reconsiders the role of money and banking in monetary policy analysis by including a banking sector and money in an optimizing model otherwise of a standard type. The model is implemented quantitatively, with a calibration based on U.S. data. It is reasonably successful in providing an endogenous explanation for substantial steady-state differentials between the interbank policy rate and (ⅰ) the collateralized loan rate, (ⅱ) the uncollateralized loan rate, (ⅲ) the T-bill rate, (ⅳ) the net marginal product of capital, and (ⅴ) a pure intertemporal rate. We find a differential of over 3 % pa between (ⅲ) and (ⅳ), thereby contributing to resolution of the equity premium puzzle. Dynamic impulse response functions imply pro-or-counter-cyclical movements in an external finance premium that can be of quantitative significance. In addition, they suggest that a central bank that fails to recognize the distinction between interbank and other short rates could miss its appropriate settings by as much as 4% pa. Also, shocks to banking productivity or collateral effectiveness call for large responses in the policy rate.
机译:本文通过将银行部门和货币纳入其他标准类型的优化模型中,重新考虑了货币和银行在货币政策分析中的作用。该模型是定量实现的,并基于美国数据进行了校准。在银行间政策利率与(ⅰ)抵押贷款利率,(ⅱ)非抵押贷款利率,(ⅲ)国库券利率,(ⅳ)利率之间的实质稳态差异方面提供内生解释的合理成功。资本的边际净产量,以及(ⅴ)纯跨期利率。我们发现(ⅲ)与(ⅳ)之间的年均差异超过3%,从而有助于解决股权溢价之谜。动态冲激响应函数暗示着外部金融溢价中的按周期或逆周期变动,这可能具有量化意义。此外,他们建议,如果一家中央银行未能意识到银行间同业拆借利率与其他短期利率之间的区别,则可能会错过其适当的设定水平,即每年多达4%。同样,对银行生产率或抵押有效性的冲击要求对政策利率做出大的回应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号