...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series >DOES A CURRENCY UNION NEED A CAPITAL MARKET UNION? RISK SHARING VIA BANKS AND MARKETS
【24h】

DOES A CURRENCY UNION NEED A CAPITAL MARKET UNION? RISK SHARING VIA BANKS AND MARKETS

机译:货币联盟需要资本市场联盟吗?通过银行和市场共享风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compare risk sharing in response to demand and supply shocks in four types of currency unions: segmented markets; a banking union; a capital market union; and complete financial markets. We show that a banking union is efficient at sharing all domestic demand shocks (deleveraging, fiscal consolidation), while a capital market union is necessary to share supply shocks (productivity and quality shocks). Using a calibrated model we provide evidence of substantial welfare gains from a banking union and, in the presence of supply shocks, from a capital market union.
机译:我们比较风险分享,以响应四种货币工会中的需求和供应冲击:分段市场;银行联盟;资本市场联盟;完整的金融市场。我们展示银行联盟在共享所有国内需求冲击时高效(覆盖,财政整合),而资本市场联盟是股票供应冲击(生产力和质量冲击)。使用校准模式,我们提供了来自银行联盟的大量福利获得的证据,并在资本市场联盟的供应冲击存在下。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series》 |2019年第26026期|A1-A11-41|共42页
  • 作者单位

    Joseba Martinez London Business School Department of Economics Regents Park NW1 4SA London United Kingdom;

    Thomas Philippon New York University Stern School of Business 44 West 4th Street Suite 9-190 New York NY 10012-1126 and NBER;

    Markus Sihvonen Bank of Finland Snellmaninaukio P.O.Box 160 00101 Helsinki Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号