...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series >DOES A CURRENCY UNION NEED A CAPITAL MARKET UNION? RISK SHARING VIA BANKS AND MARKETS
【24h】

DOES A CURRENCY UNION NEED A CAPITAL MARKET UNION? RISK SHARING VIA BANKS AND MARKETS

机译:货币联盟需要资本市场联盟吗?通过银行和市场分担风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compare risk sharing in response to demand and supply shocks in four types of currency unions: segmented markets; a banking union; a capital market union; and complete financial markets. We show that a banking union is efficient at sharing all domestic demand shocks (deleveraging, fiscal consolidation), while a capital market union is necessary to share supply shocks (productivity and quality shocks). Using a calibrated model we provide evidence of substantial welfare gains from a banking union and, in the presence of supply shocks, from a capital market union.
机译:我们在四种类型的货币联盟中比较了为应对需求和供应冲击而进行的风险分担:细分市场;银行工会;资本市场工会;和完整的金融市场。我们表明,一个银行业工会可以有效地分担所有内需冲击(去杠杆化,财政整顿),而资本市场工会对于分担供应冲击(生产力和质量冲击)是必要的。使用校准模型,我们提供了从银行业工会以及在存在供应冲击的情况下从资本市场工会获得的大量福利的证据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series》 |2019年第26026期|A1-A11-41|共42页
  • 作者单位

    Joseba Martinez London Business School Department of Economics Regents Park NW1 4SA London United Kingdom;

    Thomas Philippon New York University Stern School of Business 44 West 4th Street, Suite 9-190 New York, NY 10012-1126 and NBER;

    Markus Sihvonen Bank of Finland Snellmaninaukio P.O.Box 160 00101 Helsinki Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号