首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >SHOULD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ISSUE FLOATING RATE NOTES?
【24h】

SHOULD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ISSUE FLOATING RATE NOTES?

机译:美国政府应该发行浮动利率债券吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since January 2014 the U.S. Treasury has been issuing floating rate notes (FRNs). We estimate that the U.S. FRNs have been paying excess interest between 5 and 39 basis points above the implied cost for other Treasury securities. We find a strong positive relation between our estimated excess spreads on FRNs and the subsequent realized excess returns of FRNs over related T-bill investment strategies. With more than 300 billion dollars of FRNs outstanding, the yearly excess borrowing costs are estimated to be several hundreds of millions of dollars. To rationalize this finding, we examine the role of FRNs from the perspective of optimal government debt management to smooth taxes. In the model, bills can be cheaper to issue than FRNs, and the payoffs for FRNs are perfectly correlated with future short rates. FRNs can be used to manage the refinancing risk from rolling over short-term debt. We derive conditions under which the issuance of FRNs can optimally be positive.
机译:自2014年1月以来,美国财政部一直在发行浮动利率票据(FRN)。我们估计,美国FRN所支付的额外利息比其他美国国债的隐含成本高出5至39个基点。我们发现,我们估计的FRN的超额利差与随后的FRN相对于相关国库券投资策略的超额收益之间存在很强的正相关关系。拥有超过3000亿美元的未偿还FRN,每年的超额借贷成本估计为数亿美元。为了使这一发现合理化,我们从最佳政府债务管理到平滑税收的角度考察了FRN的作用。在该模型中,票据的发行价格可能比FRN便宜,而且FRN的收益与未来的短期利率完全相关。 FRN可以用来管理因短期债务展期而产生的再融资风险。我们推导了FRNs发行可以最优为正的条件。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics》 |2020年第27065期|a1-a11-38|共39页
  • 作者单位

    Harvard Kennedy School 79 John F. Kennedy Street Cambridge MA 02138;

    Finance Department The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvan 3620 Locust Walk Philadelphia PA 19104 and NBER;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号