...
首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Research >Monitoring change in the vertebrate fauna of central Queensland, Australia, over a period of broad-scale vegetation clearance, 1973—2002
【24h】

Monitoring change in the vertebrate fauna of central Queensland, Australia, over a period of broad-scale vegetation clearance, 1973—2002

机译:监测1973-2002年澳大利亚昆士兰州中部脊椎动物群落的广泛变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study reports change in the bird, mammal and amphibian fauna of the Emerald district, central Queensland, as detected from comparison of an inventory study undertaken in 1973–76, with a resurvey undertaken in 2001–02. Over this period, the region was subjected to unusually high rates of vegetation clearance, with the extent of native vegetation declining from 87% to 41%. In Australia, and elsewhere, there are remarkably few such long-term longitudinal studies, and particularly so for those that sample the same sites using identical procedures, and for those undertaken in a region of such dramatic environmental change. The ability to detect change from this dataset is constrained by the relatively small number of survey sites (24–45 survey sites, depending upon the taxonomic group considered). The interpretation of change is also affected by very different climatic conditions between the baseline and resurvey. Higher rainfall in the baseline survey period contributed to the most evident change, a major reduction in the number of waterbirds. However, even with waterbirds excluded, there was a significant change in the bird assemblage across the set of survey sites between the two periods. There were significant increases for a number of typically grassland birds (e.g. red-backed fairy-wren (Malurus melanocephalus), brown quail (Coturnix ypsilophora)) and significant decreases for a range of typically forest or woodland birds (e.g. grey shrike-thrush (Colluricincla harmonica), spiny-cheeked honeyeater (Acanthagenys rufogularis), striped honeyeater (Plectorhyncha lanceolata), grey fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa)). These changes were largely maintained even when the dataset was restricted to only those sites that remained uncleared: that is, changes were evident not only across the changing landscape as a whole but there were also significant (consequential) changes at uncleared sites. Most of the native mammal species that were recorded sufficiently often to test for change showed a pattern of decline. Again, for some species (pale field-rat (Rattus tunneyi), greater glider (Petauroides volans) and eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus)), this decline occurred even within uncleared woodland sites. The most notable change in the frog fauna was the major increase in the exotic cane toad (Bufo marinus), but there were also significant declines for two native frog species. These results suggest a general trajectory of decline in distinctive woodland species, and their broad-scale replacement by more commensal species (weedy generalists favoured by human modification of the landscape).
机译:这项研究报告了昆士兰州中部翡翠区鸟类,哺乳动物和两栖动物的变化,该变化是通过对1973-76年进行的清单研究与2001-02年进行的调查进行比较而发现的。在此期间,该地区的植被清除率异常高,原生植被的比例从87%下降至41%。在澳大利亚和其他地方,很少有这样的长期纵向研究,尤其是对于那些使用相同程序对相同地点进行采样的人,以及在如此剧烈的环境变化地区进行的人。从该数据集中检测变化的能力受到相对较少数量的调查站点(24-45个调查站点,取决于所考虑的分类组)的限制。基线和复查之间气候条件的完全不同也会影响对变化的解释。基线调查期降雨增加是最明显的变化,水鸟数量大大减少。但是,即使不包括水鸟,两个时期之间整个调查地点的鸟类组合也发生了重大变化。一些典型的草原鸟类(例如红背神仙((Malurus melanocephalus),棕鹌鹑(Coturnix ypsilophora))显着增加,而一系列典型的森林或林地鸟类(例如灰色伯劳鹅口疮( Colluricincla口琴),多刺的蜜食者(Acanthagenys rufogularis),条纹的蜜食者(Plectorhyncha lanceolata),灰色的凤尾鱼(Rhipidura fuliginosa))。即使将数据集仅限于那些仍未清除的站点,这些更改仍在很大程度上得以保留:也就是说,更改不仅在整个变化的景观中是显而易见的,而且在未清除的站点中也存在显着(相应)的更改。记录足够频繁以测试变化的大多数天然哺乳动物物种呈下降趋势。同样,对于某些物种(苍白的鼠鼠(Rattus tunneyi),更大的滑翔机(Petauroides volans)和东部的灰色袋鼠(Macropus giganteus)),这种下降甚至发生在未开垦的林地内。青蛙动物区系中最显着的变化是外来甘蔗蟾蜍(Bufo marinus)的大量增加,但两种本地青蛙物种也有显着下降。这些结果表明,独特的林地物种总体呈下降趋势,并被更常见的物种广泛取代(杂草丛生的人工林受到人类对景观的改造所青睐)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wildlife Research》 |2006年第4期|p.263-274|共12页
  • 作者单位

    A Department of Natural Resources, Environment & the Arts, PO Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia. B Environmental Protection Agency, PO Box 906, Emerald, Qld 4720, Australia. C Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 155, Albert Street, Brisbane, Qld 4002, Australia. D Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 731, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia. E Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1330, North Rockhampton, Qld 4700, Australia. F Australasian Resource Consultants Pty Ltd, Suite 5b, Swann Road, Taringa, Qld 4068, Australia.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号