首页> 外文期刊>Wetlands >Rake Sampling to Estimate Biomass of Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in Coastal Wetlands
【24h】

Rake Sampling to Estimate Biomass of Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in Coastal Wetlands

机译:耙抽样以估算沿海湿地浸没水生植被的生物量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We evaluated two rake-enclosure sampling methods for estimating biomass of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) within managed tidal impoundments (MTIs) in the Ashepoo-Combahee-Edisto Rivers Basin, South Carolina. We collected SAV using a modified rake within 0.086 m(2) cylindrical sampler (CS), a non-modified rake within 0.2-m(2) quadrat (QS), and after raking, hand-collected remaining SAV within each enclosure (i.e., rake + hand = total SAV biomass). We used linear mixed models to evaluate rake sampling methods to estimate total (QS and CS) and species-specific SAV biomass (QS). The marginal coefficient of determination (R-2) for both rake sampling methods was 0.95 for estimating total SAV biomass and model fitted values met our a priori acceptable level of precision (CV = 15-20%). Furthermore, the QS-rake method explained 95% of the variation in total widgeongrass biomass (Ruppia maritima), 97% of dwarf spikerush biomass (Eleocharis parvula), and 97% of muskgrass (Chara spp.) biomass but model fitted values only met a priori precision for widgeongrass biomass. We conclude that our rake-SAV sampling estimates total SAV and widgeongrass biomass with little unexplained variation. Furthermore, abiotic variables had no significant effect when estimating SAV biomass. We suggest managers and researchers use our rake methods to estimate biomass of SAV in wetlands with similar species compositions, and resulting estimates may be used to estimate foraging carrying capacity for habitat conservation planning and management.
机译:我们评估了两种耙外壳采样方法,用于估算南卡罗来纳州Ashepoo-Combahee-Edisto河流河盆地管理的潮气(MTIS)内的浸没水生植被(SAV)的生物量。我们在0.086米(2)(2)圆柱采样器(CS)内的改进耙子,在0.2-m(2)(2)Quadrat(QS)内的非修改耙中收集了SAV,耙耙后,在每个机箱内剩余的剩余可留下(即,耙+手=总节省生物质)。我们使用了线性混合模型来评估耙采样方法来估计总(QS和CS)和物种特定的SAV生物量(QS)。耙采样方法的边缘测定系数(R-2)为0.95,用于估计总节省生物质和模型拟合值符合我们的优先考虑的精度(CV <= 15-20%)。此外,QS-Rake方法解释了威奇森草(Ruppia Maritima)的95%的变异,97%的Dwarf尖刺生物质(Eleoocharis parvula)和97%的麝香(Chara SPP)生物量,但仅符合模型拟合值WidgeOngrass生物量的先验精度。我们得出结论,我们的Rake-SAM采样估计总救护和WidgeOngrass生物量几乎没有解释的变化。此外,在估计SAV生物质时,非生物变量没有显着效果。我们建议经理和研究人员利用我们的耙子方法来估算具有类似物种组成的湿地的湿地的生物量,因此可用于估算栖息地保护规划和管理的居住能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wetlands》 |2020年第5期|957-966|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Clemson Univ James C Kennedy Waterfowl & Wetlands Conservat Ct Belle W Baruch Inst Coastal Ecol & Forest Sci Georgetown SC 29442 USA|Clemson Univ Dept Forestry & Environm Conservat Clemson SC 29634 USA|Tennessee Technol Univ Dept Biol Pennebaker Hall 1100 N Dixie Ave Cookeville TN 38501 USA;

    Nemours Wildlife Fdn Yemassee SC 29945 USA;

    Clemson Univ James C Kennedy Waterfowl & Wetlands Conservat Ct Belle W Baruch Inst Coastal Ecol & Forest Sci Georgetown SC 29442 USA|Clemson Univ Dept Forestry & Environm Conservat Clemson SC 29634 USA;

    Clemson Univ Dept Forestry & Environm Conservat Clemson SC 29634 USA;

    Clemson Univ Dept Forestry & Environm Conservat Clemson SC 29634 USA;

    Nemours Wildlife Fdn Yemassee SC 29945 USA;

    Clemson Univ Sch Math & Stat Sci Clemson SC 29634 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Aquatic macrophytes; Carrying capacity; Coastal wetlands; Precision; Ruppia maritima; Sampling methods;

    机译:水生甲状腺素;承载能力;沿海湿地;精度;罗比Maritima;采样方法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号