首页> 外文期刊>WET News >A Question Of Responsibility
【24h】

A Question Of Responsibility

机译:责任问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The floods in June and July last year left 13 dead, forced thousands from their homes and caused £3B-worth of damage. Yorkshire and the Humber, the Midlands and south-west England were among the worst-hit regions following the wettest May to July on record. So who was to blame for the obvious failings that occurred? Sir Michael Pitt, in his recently published final review into last year's emergency, did not point the finger at any one particular body or organisation. Yet, in his list of almost 100 recommendations, water utilities - along with the Environment -Agency (EA), the government and local authorities - have their part to play in learning the lessons from the crisis.
机译:去年6月和7月的洪水造成13人死亡,数千人被迫离开家园,并造成价值3B英镑的破坏。在有记录的五月至七月最潮湿之后,约克郡和亨伯,中部地区和英格兰西南部是受灾最严重的地区。那么,谁应该为发生的明显失败负责呢?迈克尔·皮特爵士(Sir Michael Pitt)在最近发表的对去年紧急状况的最终评估中,没有将矛头指向任何一个特定的机构或组织。然而,在他的近100条建议清单中,自来水公司-以及环境署(EA),政府和地方政府-在汲取这场危机的教训中发挥了作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《WET News》 |2008年第8期|p.4|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 水利工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号