...
首页> 外文期刊>Water21 >The right route to a human right?
【24h】

The right route to a human right?

机译:正确的人权路线?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For a text so short, there is a lot wrong with the UN resolution on the human right to water and sanitation, adopted by the General Assembly in July.rnThe main complaint is regarding the process behind it. The draft text put to the vote had not been prepared through a process of consensus within the UN system. Plus it is an initiative outside of the ongoing work of the UN being carried out by the Human Rights Council.rnThen there is the question as to just what States are being asked to support. Human rights are universal and inalienable rights that States assume an obligation and duty to respect, protect and take positive action to fulfil. Are States prepared to make that commitment? What does it mean in practice? And given the diversity of what it might mean, are States even asreeina to the same thine?
机译:对于这么短的文本,联合国在7月通过的关于水和卫生设施人权的决议有很多错误。主要的抱怨是有关其背后的程序。付诸表决的案文草案不是通过联合国系统内部的共识过程编写的。此外,这是人权理事会正在进行的联合国正在进行的工作之外的一项举措。然后是一个问题,就是要求哪些国家予以支持。人权是各国的普遍和不可剥夺的权利,各国有义务和义务尊重,保护和采取积极行动来实现。各国是否准备作出这一承诺?实际上是什么意思?鉴于其含义的多样性,各国甚至对同样的想法感到恐惧吗?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water21》 |2010年第10期|P.10|共1页
  • 作者

    Keith Hayward;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号