...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Application of the Improved City Blueprint Framework in 45 Municipalities and Regions
【24h】

Application of the Improved City Blueprint Framework in 45 Municipalities and Regions

机译:改进的城市蓝图框架在45个城市和地区的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Rapid urbanization, water pollution, climate change and inadequate maintenance of water and wastewater infrastructures in cities may lead to flooding, water scarcity, adverse health effects, and rehabilitation costs that may overwhelm the resilience of cities. Furthermore, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) is hindered by water governance gaps. We have analyzed IWRM in 45 municipalities and regions divided over 27 countries using the improved City BlueprintA (R) Framework (CBF). The CBF incorporates solely performance-oriented indicators that more accurately measure the city's own efforts and performances to improve its IWRM. We have also analyzed the trends and pressures (on which the city's IWRM has a negligible influence). The Trends and Pressure Framework (TPF) creates awareness of the most stressing topics that either hamper or, on the contrary, pose opportunity windows for IWRM. The improved Blue City Index (BCI*) and the Trends and Pressures Index (TPI; the arithmetic mean of all TPF indicators) have been compared with other city descriptors. The BCI* and TPI showed a significant and negative Pearson correlation (r = -0.83). This implies that cities with pressing needs to improve their IWRM also face the highest environmental, financial and/or social limitations. The BCI* and TPI correlate significantly with the ND-GAIN climate readiness index (r = 0.86; r = -0.94), the environmental awareness index (r = 0.85; r = -0.85), the European green city index (r = 0.86; r = -0.85) and various World Bank governance indicators. Based on a hierarchical clustering of the 45 municipalities and regions, 5 different levels of sustainability of urban IWRM could be distinguished, i.e., (1) cities lacking basic water services, (2) wasteful cities, (3) water efficient cities, (4) resource efficient and adaptive cities, and (5) water wise cities. This categorization, as well as the CBF and TPF are heuristic approaches to speed up the transition towards water wise cities.
机译:快速的城市化,水污染,气候变化以及城市中水和废水基础设施的维护不足,可能导致洪水,水资源短缺,不利的健康影响以及恢复成本,可能使城市的复原力不堪重负。此外,水资源治理方面的差距阻碍了水资源综合管理(IWRM)。我们已经使用改进的城市蓝图(R)框架(CBF)分析了遍布27个国家/地区的45个城市和地区的水资源综合管理。 CBF仅包含以绩效为导向的指标,可以更准确地衡量该市为改善其水资源综合管理而付出的努力和绩效。我们还分析了趋势和压力(该市的水资源综合管理对其影响可忽略不计)。趋势和压力框架(TPF)使人们认识到那些最有压力的主题,这些主题可能会阻碍IWRM的发展,反之亦然。改进后的蓝色城市指数(BCI *)和趋势和压力指数(TPI;所有TPF指标的算术平均值)已与其他城市描述符进行了比较。 BCI *和TPI显示出显着的负皮尔逊相关性(r = -0.83)。这意味着,迫切需要改善其水资源综合管理的城市也面临着最高的环境,财务和/或社会限制。 BCI *和TPI与ND-GAIN气候就绪指数(r = 0.86; r = -0.94),环境意识指数(r = 0.85; r = -0.85),欧洲绿色城市指数(r = 0.86)显着相关; r = -0.85)和世界银行的各种治理指标。基于45个城市和地区的分层聚类,可以区分5个不同级别的城市水资源综合管理的可持续性,即(1)缺乏基本水服务的城市,(2)浪费的城市,(3)节水的城市,(4 )资源高效且适应性强的城市,以及(5)节水型城市。这种分类以及CBF和TPF都是启发式方法,可加快向水明智城市的过渡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号