...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Methodology to Evaluate Aquifers Water Budget Alteration Due to Climate Change Impact on the Snow Fraction
【24h】

Methodology to Evaluate Aquifers Water Budget Alteration Due to Climate Change Impact on the Snow Fraction

机译:评估含水层的水预算改变因气候变化对雪分数的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper aims to propose a methodology to evaluate and quantify perturbed groundwater budgets considering the projected reduction of Average Snow Fraction of Surface Runoff (ASFSR). Future groundwater budgets are generated considering different CC temporal Scenarios, RCMs, as well as the status of each Groundwater Body (GwB). The proposed methodology is applied to the Central Mountain Range of Iberian Peninsula (Avila Province). Existing studies show a drastic Reduction on Snow Melting (RSM) and on Cumulative Snow Volume (CSV). This leads to a huge reduction of Average Snow Fraction of Surface Runoff (ASFSR) and on groundwater availability calculated through the indicator Perturbed Exploitation Index (PEI). There are important differences depending on the RCM used, on the temporal CC Scenario and on the GwB considered. Main difficulties and challenges comprise the lack of field data and rigorous studies on modelling of groundwater hydrodynamic modelling. Despite of that, research results show a robust and generalized increase in all Exploitation Indexes (EI). EI increase is of 4.17 % for IP1 (Short Term) RCP 4.5, 14.94 % for IP2 (Medium Term) RCP 4.5, 17.65 % for IP3 (Long Term) RCP 4.5. On the other hand, there is an increase of 9.89 % for IP1 RCP 8.5, 19.05 % for IP2 RCP 8.5 and 35.14 % for IP3 RCP 8.5. Thus, there is a generalised and very important decrease of recharge (PARR) of 59.03 % for IP1 RCP 4.5, 88.97 % for IP2 RCP 4.5, 90.02 % for IP3. Likewise, for RCP 8.5, there is a decrease of 72.69 % for IP1 RCP 8.5, 88.97 % for IP2 RCP 8.5 and 97.90 % for IP3.
机译:本文旨在提出一种方法来评估和量化扰动地下水预算,考虑到表面径流平均雪分数(ASFSR)的预计降低。考虑到不同的CC时间情况,RCM和每个地下水位(GWB)的地位产生未来的地下水预算。拟议的方法适用于伊比利亚半岛(阿维拉省)的中央山脉。现有研究表明雪熔化(RSM)和累积雪卷(CSV)的急剧减少。这导致表面径流(ASFSR)平均雪分数的巨大降低以及通过指标扰动剥削指数(PEI)计算的地下水可用性。根据所使用的RCM,在考虑的时间CC场景和GWB上使用的RCM,存在重要差异。主要困难和挑战包括缺乏现场数据和对地下水流体动力学建模建模的严格研究。尽管如此,研究结果表明所有剥削指数(EI)的强大和广义增加。 II增加为IP1(短期)RCP 4.5,IP2(中期)RCP 4.5,17.94%,17.65%,IP3(长期)RCP 4.5,17.65%。另一方面,IP1 RCP 8.5,IP2 RCP 8.5和IP3 RCP 8.5的35.14%增加了9.89%。因此,对于IP1 RCP 4.5,88.97%的IP2 RCP 4.5,90.02%的IP3,IP3的IP3 4.5,90.02%的推广(PARR)的广义和非常重要的降低。同样,对于RCP 8.5,IP1 RCP 8.5,88.97%的IP2 RCP 8.5和IP3的97.90%的降低减少了72.69%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号