首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Comparison of Empirical Copula-Based Joint Deficit Index (JDI) and Multivariate Standardized Precipitation Index (MSPI) for Drought Monitoring in Iran
【24h】

Comparison of Empirical Copula-Based Joint Deficit Index (JDI) and Multivariate Standardized Precipitation Index (MSPI) for Drought Monitoring in Iran

机译:基于经验Copula的联合赤字指数(JDI)和多变量标准化降水指数(MSPI)在伊朗干旱监测中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Multi-index drought indices are based on a combination of single drought indices and able to monitor the overall status of drought in a certain location. The aim of the present paper is to compare two recently developed multi-index drought indices, i.e., Joint Deficit Index (JDI) and Multivariate Standardized Precipitation Index (MSPI) under different climatic conditions of Iran. Although these drought indices are calculated using different statistical methods, they need twelve modified Standardized Precipitation Index (SPImod) corresponding to 12 time windows from 1 to 12 months as the input variables. In this study, these indices were calculated using the monthly precipitation data of 42 weather stations representing diverse climates of Iran during the period of 1966–2010. JDI and MSPI were compared from different viewpoints including temporal behavior, the relationship between drought severity and duration and frequencies of drought classes. The results showed that both indices have a similar trend of drought severity at all stations. Unlike the MSPI, the JDI faced two substantial problems in all stations of interest: 1) The lowest value of the JDI time series was frequently repeated in different parts of its time series, 2) The JDI was not able to identify the peak of drought severity during the critical drought periods. While the JDI could not identify the extreme (at about all stations) and very severe (at one third of stations) drought classes, the observed frequencies of the MSPI’s drought classes successfully matched the corresponding expected frequencies. The obtained results clearly indicate the superiority of the MSPI for monitoring overall status of droughts in different climatic conditions of Iran in comparison to the JDI.
机译:多指标干旱指数是基于单个干旱指数的组合,能够监视特定位置的干旱总体状况。本文的目的是比较伊朗在不同气候条件下最近开发的两个多指标干旱指数,即联合赤字指数(JDI)和多变量标准降水指数(MSPI)。尽管这些干旱指数是使用不同的统计方法计算的,但它们需要12个修改后的标准降水指数(SPImod)对应于1至12个月的12个时间窗作为输入变量。在这项研究中,这些指数是使用代表1966-2010年期间伊朗不同气候的42个气象站的月降水量数据计算得出的。从不同的角度比较了JDI和MSPI,包括时间行为,干旱严重程度与持续时间和干旱分类频率之间的关系。结果表明,这两个指数在所有站都具有相似的干旱严重程度趋势。与MSPI不同,JDI在所有感兴趣的站点中都面临两个重大问题:1)JDI时间序列的最低值经常在其时间序列的不同部分重复出现; 2)JDI无法识别干旱高峰关键干旱时期的严重程度。尽管JDI无法识别极端干旱(大约在所有气象站)和非常严重(在三分之一的气象站),但MSPI干旱等级的观测频率成功地匹配了相应的预期频率。获得的结果清楚地表明,与JDI相比,MSPI在监测伊朗不同气候条件下的干旱总体状况方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号