首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Comparison of a type curve and a least-squared errors method to estimate biofilm kinetic parameters
【24h】

Comparison of a type curve and a least-squared errors method to estimate biofilm kinetic parameters

机译:比较类型曲线和最小二乘误差法估算生物膜动力学参数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Because of the kinetics of diffusion limitation and the difficulty of replicating biofilm structure in a test vessel, biokinetic parameters of substrate consumption (maximum specific substrate removal rate, q_m and half-maximum removal coefficient, K_s) are particularly difficult to measure in biofilm reactors. In this research, a type curve method using load-shift experiments was compared to a method using a least-squared errors (LSE) routine. More accurate and precise estimates were obtained with the LSE routine than with the type curve method by removing subjectivity from the estimation process. In addition, the LSE estimation process allowed a more rigorous evaluation of the adequacy of the data fit, permitted estimation of approximate confidence intervals of parameters, and identified flaws in the data set. As a result, we advocate the use of the recently developed LSE based estimation routine to estimate parameters from such experiments.
机译:由于扩散限制的动力学和在测试容器中复制生物膜结构的困难,底物消耗的生物动力学参数(最大比底物去除率q_m和最大半数去除系数K_s)在生物膜反应器中尤其难以测量。在这项研究中,将使用负荷转移实验的类型曲线方法与使用最小二乘误差(LSE)例程的方法进行了比较。通过消除估计过程的主观性,与使用类型曲线方法相比,使用LSE例程可以获得更准确,更精确的估计。此外,LSE估计过程允许对数据拟合的充分性进行更严格的评估,允许估计参数的近似置信区间,并确定数据集中的缺陷。因此,我们提倡使用最近开发的基于LSE的估算程序来估算此类实验的参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号