首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Comparison of empirical and mechanistic equations for vegetative filter strip pesticide mitigation in long-term environmental exposure assessments
【24h】

Comparison of empirical and mechanistic equations for vegetative filter strip pesticide mitigation in long-term environmental exposure assessments

机译:长期环境暴露评估中用于减缓植物性滤材杀虫剂的经验方程和机理方程的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent advances in mechanistic modeling of vegetated filter strips (VFS) have made it possible to incorporate VFS mitigation into environmental exposure assessments (EEAs). However, outside of fixed efficiency approaches, there are no widely adopted and standardized procedures for incorporating VFS quantitative mitigation into long-term, higher-tier EEAs. A source of hesitation involves the use of empirical equations for predicting pesticide trapping by the VFS. A recent study evaluated existing empirical equations and a mechanistic mass-balance approach using the most extensive field database available of VFS pesticide efficiency from single-event storms. That study concluded that an updated empirical equation (Sabbagh equation) and a mechanistic mass-balance approach performed reasonably well. The objective of this research was to study the effect of upscaling the VFS trapping equations from single events into long-term EEAs. The U.S. EPA Pesticide in Water Calculator (PWC) model linked with the Vegetative Filter Strip MODeling system (VFSMOD) long-term EEA modeling framework (30 yr) was updated to incorporate the alternative trapping equations and tested VFS mitigation results under contrasting agroecological settings with varying erosion/sediment transport conditions. Differences in both acute and chronic 90th percentile estimated environmental exposure concentrations (EECs) were relatively small when comparing predictions using the four pesticide trapping equations. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) also indicated that selection of a specific trapping equation for predicting EECs was less important than other important input factors such as the VFS length and pesticide properties. However, in terms of the percent reductions in EECs, the choice of pesticide trapping equation was as important as the VFS length. This research builds upon the conclusion of previous single-event studies that the mechanistic mass-balance and refit Sabbagh empirical equation were both valid for EEAs. The mass balance approach represents a reasonable option for regulatory agencies that prefer mechanistic approaches. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:植被过滤带(VFS)的机械建模的最新进展使得将VFS缓解纳入环境暴露评估(EEA)成为可能。但是,除了固定效率方法之外,没有将VFS量化缓解措施纳入长期,更高层EEA的广泛采用的标准化程序。犹豫的原因包括使用经验方程式来预测VFS捕集农药的情况。最近的一项研究使用了范围最广的单事件暴发中VFS农药效率的现场数据库,评估了现有的经验方程式和机械质量平衡方法。该研究得出的结论是,更新的经验方程式(Sabbagh方程式)和机械质量平衡方法表现良好。这项研究的目的是研究将VFS捕获方程从单一事件升级为长期EEA的影响。与植物滤料条模型系统(VFSMOD)的长期EEA模型框架(30年)链接的美国EPA水中杀虫剂计算器(PWC)模型进行了更新,以纳入替代的捕集方程式,并在与农业生态环境不同的对比下测试了VFS缓解结果变化的侵蚀/沉积物运输条件。当比较使用四种农药捕获方程式的预测时,急性和慢性第90个百分位点的估计环境暴露浓度(EEC)的差异相对较小。全球敏感性分析(GSA)还表明,选择特定的捕集方程来预测EEC的重要性不如VFS长度和农药特性等其他重要输入因素重要。但是,就减少EECs的百分比而言,农药捕集方程的选择与VFS长度一样重要。该研究基于先前的单事件研究得出的结论,即机械质量平衡和改装Sabbagh经验方程式均适用于EEA。对于喜欢采用机械方法的监管机构,质量平衡方法是一个合理的选择。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号