首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >Judges Ask Tough Questions Of EPA, Critics in Suit Over CWA Rule Venue
【24h】

Judges Ask Tough Questions Of EPA, Critics in Suit Over CWA Rule Venue

机译:法官问EPA的棘手问题,对CWA规则场地的诉讼提出批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit raised tough questions for EPA and critics of the agency's Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction rule at oral argument over which courts have authority to hear suits over the rule, with two of the judges hinting they could stay the case pending resolution of a similar 6th Circuit suit. "What about if we just abstain as did the 11th Circuit, calling it a colossal waste of time" to have duplicative litigation playing out in multiple appellate circuits, one judge asked during the recent argument in the 10th Circuit case Chamber of Commerce, et ah, v. EPA, et al. The case contests a lower court's ruling that rejected a suit over the jurisdiction rule by deferring to a split 6th Circuit ruling giving that court power to hear such suits.
机译:美国第十巡回上诉法院的法官对EPA提出了严峻的问题,并对该机构的《清洁水法》(CWA)管辖权规则提出了口头辩论,其中法院有权听取对该规则的诉讼,其中两位法官暗示他们可以继续等待,直到解决类似的第六巡回赛诉讼。一位法官在第十巡回法庭商会最近的辩论中问道:“如果我们像第十一巡回法庭一样弃权,称其为时间的巨大浪费,那么在多个上诉巡回法庭进行重复的诉讼该怎么办?”诉EPA等。该案通过驳回第六巡回法院的一项分庭裁定,赋予该法院审理此类诉讼的权力,驳回了下级法院针对管辖权规则拒绝诉讼的裁决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号