首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >States Argue 6th Circuit CWA Ruling Cannot Preclude 11th Circuit Appeal
【24h】

States Argue 6th Circuit CWA Ruling Cannot Preclude 11th Circuit Appeal

机译:美国争论第六巡回法院CWA裁决不能排除第十一巡回上诉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A coalition of 11 Southern states is arguing that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit's decision to hear suits over EPA's Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction rule cannot preclude their 11th Circuit appeal that argues suits over the rule should be heard first in district court, saying the 6th Circuit's ruling is not binding on the 11th Circuit. "The States respectfully request that this Court resolve the very live issue between the parties of subject matter jurisdiction, and remand the case to the district court for consideration of the merits of the States' claims," state plaintiffs led by Georgia say in a May 16 supplemental brief filed with the 11th Circuit in State of Georgia et al., v. McCarthy, et al. (Doc. ID: 191385).
机译:南部11个州组成的联盟争辩说,第六巡回法院的美国上诉法院关于对EPA的《清洁水法》(CWA)管辖权规则提起诉讼的裁决不能排除其在第11巡回法院的上诉,该上诉认为对该规则的诉讼应首先在地区进行法院说,第六巡回法院的裁决对第十一巡回法院没有约束力。由格鲁吉亚牵头的各州原告在五月份说:“各州尊重本法院要求解决本案管辖权当事方之间的鲜为人知的问题,并将该案发回地方法院,以考虑各州的案情。”佐治亚州第11巡回法院等诉诉麦卡锡等人的16份补充摘要。 (文档ID:191385)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号