...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >An integrated analytical framework for quantifying the LCOE of waste-to-energy facilities for a range of greenhouse gas emissions policy and technical factors
【24h】

An integrated analytical framework for quantifying the LCOE of waste-to-energy facilities for a range of greenhouse gas emissions policy and technical factors

机译:一个综合的分析框架,用于量化一系列温室气体排放政策和技术因素的废物能源转化设施的LCOE

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presents a novel integrated method for considering the economics of waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities with priced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based upon technical and economic characteristics of the WTE facility, MSW stream, landfill alternative, and GHG emissions policy. The study demonstrates use of the formulation for six different policy scenarios and explores sensitivity of the results to ranges of certain technical parameters as found in existing literature. The study shows that details of the GHG emissions regulations have large impact on the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of WTE and that GHG regulations can either increase or decrease the LCOE of WTE depending on policy choices regarding biogenic fractions from combusted waste and emissions from landfills. Important policy considerations are the fraction of the carbon emissions that are priced (i.e. all emissions versus only non-biogenic emissions), whether emissions credits are allowed due to reducing fugitive landfill gas emissions, whether biogenic carbon sequestration in landfills is credited against landfill emissions, and the effectiveness of the landfill gas recovery system where waste would otherwise have been buried. The default landfill gas recovery system effectiveness assumed by much of the industry yields GHG offsets that are very close to the direct non-biogenic GHG emissions from a WTE facility, meaning that small changes in the recovery effectiveness cause relatively larger changes in the emissions factor of the WTE facility. Finally, the economics of WTE are dependent on the MSW stream composition, with paper and wood being advantageous, metal and glass being disadvantageous, and plastics, food, and yard waste being either advantageous or disadvantageous depending upon the avoided tipping fee and the GHG emissions price.
机译:这项研究提出了一种新颖的综合方法,该方法可根据WTE设施的技术和经济特征,MSW流,垃圾填埋场替代方案和GHG排放政策,来考虑具有价格温室气体(GHG)排放的废物能源(WTE)设施的经济性。该研究表明了该配方在六个不同政策情景下的使用,并探讨了结果对现有文献中发现的某些技术参数范围的敏感性。研究表明,温室气体排放法规的细节对垃圾焚烧厂的平均能源成本(LCOE)产生了很大影响,而且温室气体法规可以根据有关燃烧废物和排放的生物成分的政策选择来增加或减少垃圾焚烧厂的LCOE。垃圾填埋场。重要的政策考虑因素是定价的碳排放量的比例(即所有排放量与仅非生物排放量相比),是否由于减少了临时性的垃圾填埋气体排放而允许排放配额,是否将垃圾填埋场中的生物碳封存抵消了垃圾填埋场的排放,垃圾填埋场气体回收系统的有效性,否则垃圾将被掩埋。许多行业假设的默认垃圾填埋气回收系统效率产生的温室气体补偿非常接近WTE设施产生的直接非生物温室气体排放,这意味着回收效率的微小变化会导致排放因子的较大变化。 WTE设施。最后,根据避免的倾卸费和温室气体排放量,垃圾焚烧厂的经济性取决于城市固体废弃物的组成,纸张和木材是有利的,金属和玻璃是不利的,塑料,食品和庭院废物是有利还是不利的价钱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号