首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK
【24h】

Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK

机译:评估英国城市生活垃圾回收能源的环境可持续性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Even though landfilling of waste is the least favourable option in the waste management hierarchy, the majority of municipal solid waste (MSW) in many countries is still landfilled. This represents waste of valuable resources and could lead to higher environmental impacts compared to energy recovered by incineration, even if the landfill gas is recovered. Using life cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool, this paper aims to find out which of the following two options for MSW disposal is more environmentally sustainable: incineration or recovery of biogas from landfills, each producing either electricity or co-generating heat and electricity. The systems are compared on a life cycle basis for two functional units: 'disposal of 1 tonne of MSW and 'generation of 1 kWh of electricity'. The results indicate that, if both systems are credited for their respective recovered energy and recyclable materials, energy from incineration has much lower impacts than from landfill biogas across all impact categories, except for human toxicity. The impacts of incineration co-generating heat and electricity are negative for nine out of 11 categories as the avoided impacts for the recovered energy and materials are higher than those caused by incineration. By improving the recovery rate of biogas, some impacts of landfilling, such as global warming, depletion of fossil resources, acidification and photochemical smog, would be significantly reduced. However, most impacts of the landfill gas would still be higher than the impacts of incineration, except for global warming and human toxicity. The analysis on the basis of net electricity produced shows that the LCA impacts of electricity from incineration are several times lower in comparison to the impacts of electricity from landfill biogas. Electricity from incineration has significantly lower global warming and several other impacts than electricity from coal and oil but has higher impacts than electricity from natural gas or UK grid. At the UK level, diverting all MSW currently landfilled to incineration with energy recovery would not only avoid the environmental impacts associated with landfilling but, under the current assumptions, would also meet 2.3% of UK's electricity demand and save 2-2.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year.
机译:尽管在废物管理层次结构中,垃圾掩埋是最不利的选择,但许多国家的大多数城市固体废物(MSW)仍被掩埋。与通过焚化回收的能源相比,这意味着浪费了宝贵的资源,并且即使对垃圾填埋气进行了回收,也可能对环境造成更大的影响。本文以生命周期评估(LCA)为工具,旨在找出以下两种生活垃圾处理方案中哪一种在环境方面更具可持续性:焚烧或从垃圾填埋场回收沼气,每种沼气都发电或热电联产。在生命周期的基础上对系统进行了两个功能单元的比较:“处理1吨城市生活垃圾”和“发电1千瓦时”。结果表明,如果两个系统都以各自的回收能源和可循环利用材料而著称,那么除人类毒性外,在所有影响类别中,焚烧产生的能量影响远低于垃圾填埋沼气。焚烧热电联产的影响在11个类别中有9个是负面的,这是因为避免的对回收能源和材料的影响高于焚烧造成的影响。通过提高沼气的回收率,可以显着减少垃圾填埋的一些影响,例如全球变暖,化石资源枯竭,酸化和光化学烟雾。但是,除了全球变暖和人类毒性外,垃圾填埋气的大多数影响仍将高于焚烧的影响。根据产生的净电力进行的分析表明,与垃圾填埋沼气产生的电力影响相比,焚化产生的LCA影响要低几倍。焚烧产生的电力与煤炭和石油产生的电力相比,全球变暖和其他影响显着降低,但其产生的影响大于天然气或英国电网产生的影响。在英国,将目前垃圾填埋场的所有垃圾转移到焚化炉中进行能量回收,不仅可以避免与垃圾填埋场相关的环境影响,而且在目前的假设下,还将满足英国2.3%的电力需求,并节省2-260万吨温室气体每年的气体排放量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号