首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Long-term risk assessments comparing environmental performance of different types of sanitary landfills
【24h】

Long-term risk assessments comparing environmental performance of different types of sanitary landfills

机译:长期风险评估,比较不同类型的卫生垃圾填埋场的环境绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Landfilling of non-pretreated, mixed municipal solid and similar waste remains a major method of waste management in many parts of the world today, particularly in developing countries. Modern dry-type and bioreactor landfills are considered to be relatively safe facilities in contrast to less engineered sanitary landfills. However, highly-engineered landfills are often not applicable in low-income countries because of their high cost. Performance of low-cost types of sanitary landfills deserve further exploration, because uncontrollable dumpsites pose real long-term threats to aquifers and the most reliable means of improving the situation is by upgrading these sites into technically similar, but environmentally safe facilities. Risk assessments can provide some insight into differences in environmental performance between major types of low-cost and high-cost landfills simulating the essential landfill processes. The risk of contamination at a presumed aquifer that resides directly below a presumed landfill was quantitatively assessed in this study comparing long-term environmental performances of four different types of facilities. A risk assessment software tool which explicitly enables inclusion of uncertainty present in the estimates to generate results with a wide range of possible outcomes was used to fulfill this purpose. It was demonstrated that contaminants derived from a modern, dry-type landfill would likely leech into an aquifer with the greatest impact occurring several decades after landfill closure. However, a specifically designed and properly operated, passive semiaerobic above-ground landfill was shown to be a comparatively safe facility. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在当今世界许多地区,特别是在发展中国家,未预处理的混合市政固体废物和类似废物的掩埋仍然是废物管理的主要方法。与设计较少的卫生垃圾填埋场相比,现代干式和生物反应堆填埋场被认为是相对安全的设施。但是,由于工程造价高,垃圾填埋场通常不适用于低收入国家。低成本类型的卫生垃圾填埋场的性能值得进一步探索,因为无法控制的垃圾填埋场对含水层构成了真正的长期威胁,改善状况的最可靠方法是将这些垃圾填埋场升级为技术上类似但对环境安全的设施。风险评估可以提供一些洞见,以模拟主要的垃圾填埋过程,在主要类型的低成本和高成本垃圾填埋场之间的环境绩效差异。在本研究中,比较了四种不同类型设施的长期环境性能,定量评估了直接位于假定垃圾场下方的假定含水层中的污染风险。为了实现此目的,使用了一种风险评估软件工具,该工具可以明确地将估计中存在的不确定性包括在内,以生成具有多种可能结果的结果。结果表明,现代干式填埋场产生的污染物很可能会渗入含水层,对填埋场关闭后数十年的影响最大。然而,事实证明,经过特殊设计和正确操作的被动式半好氧地上垃圾填埋场是相对安全的设施。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号