...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >What's Wrong with Best Practice? Questioning the Typification of New Urbanism
【24h】

What's Wrong with Best Practice? Questioning the Typification of New Urbanism

机译:最佳做法有什么问题?质疑新都市主义的典型化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Best practice is most often perceived as a powerful heuristic tool for the dissemination of innovation and knowledge. Hence, its formation and acceptance are seldom questioned. The unquestioned compliance with practices labelled as 'best', however, obscures the processes of typification that enable it-that is to say, the cultural struggles, tensions, conflicts, collaborations, alliances and personal/professional justifications that prefigure it. This paper uses the proliferation of New Urbanism in Toronto to unpack theoretically the typification of best practice in order to demonstrate how the universal abstraction of this principle-based movement is underpinned by deeper, highly situated, constructions of aligned interests and emergent socio-political rationalities.
机译:最佳实践通常被认为是传播创新和知识的强大启发式工具。因此,很少质疑其形成和接受。但是,毫无疑问地遵守被标记为“最佳”做法的做法,掩盖了使之成为可能的典型化过程,也就是说,构成它的文化斗争,紧张局势,冲突,合作,结盟和个人/专业辩护。本文使用多伦多新都市主义的泛滥,从理论上解开最佳实践的典型,以证明这一基于原则的运动的普遍抽象是如何由更深,更高度定位,利益一致的结构和新兴的社会政治理性所支撑的。 。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urban Studies》 |2013年第11期|2371-2387|共17页
  • 作者

    Susan Moore;

  • 作者单位

    Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Fourth Floor, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, London, WC1H OQB, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号