首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Notes towards the queer Asian city: Singapore and Hong Kong
【24h】

Notes towards the queer Asian city: Singapore and Hong Kong

机译:前往亚洲古怪城市的注意事项:新加坡和香港

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The last decade has witnessed the emergence and consolidation of new and established gay cities in East and Southeast Asia, in particular, the sexualisation of the Singapore city-state, the commerce-led boom of queer Bangkok, the rise of middle-class gay consumer cultures in Manila and Hong Kong, and the proliferation of underground LGBT scenes in Shanghai and Beijing. In the West, scholarships on urban gay centres such as San Francisco, New York and London focus on the paradigms of ethnicity (Sinfield, 1996), gentrification (Bell and Binnie, 2004) and creativity (Florida, 2002). Mapping the rise of commercial gay neighbourhoods by combining the history of ghettos and its post-closet geography of community villages, these studies chart a teleological model of sexual minority rights, group recognition and homonormative mainstream assimilation. Instead of defaulting to these specifically North American and European paradigms and debates, this paper attempts to formulate a different theoretical framework to understand the rise of the queer Asian city. Providing case studies on Singapore and Hong Kong, and deploying an inter-disciplinary approach including critical creative industrial studies and cultural studies this paper examines the intersections across the practices of gay clusters, urban renewal and social movement. It asks: if queer Asian sexual cultures are characterised by disjunctive modernities, how do such modernities shape their spatial geographies and produce the material specificities of each city?
机译:在过去的十年中,见证了东亚和东南亚新建立的同性恋城市的出现和合并,特别是新加坡城市国家的性别化,以商业为主导的曼谷同性恋热潮,中产阶级同性恋消费者的崛起马尼拉和香港的文化,以及上海和北京地下LGBT场景的泛滥。在西方,有关城市同性恋中心(如旧金山,纽约和伦敦)的奖学金主要关注种族范式(Sinfield,1996),中产阶级化(Bell和Binnie,2004)和创造力(Florida,2002)。这些研究结合了贫民窟的历史及其社区村庄的壁橱后地理,绘制了商业同性恋社区的兴起图,从而绘制了少数群体性权利,群体认可和同性主流同化的目的论模型。本文没有默认默认的北美和欧洲范式和辩论,而是试图建立一个不同的理论框架来理解亚洲古怪城市的崛起。提供有关新加坡和香港的案例研究,并采用跨学科方法,包括批判性的创造性工业研究和文化研究,本文研究了同性恋群体,城市更新和社会运动实践之间的交集。它问:亚洲酷儿性文化是否具有分离性的现代性特征,这些现代性如何塑造其空间地理并产生每个城市的物质特性?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号