首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Does segregation reduce socio-spatial mobility? Evidence from four European countries with different inequality and segregation contexts
【24h】

Does segregation reduce socio-spatial mobility? Evidence from four European countries with different inequality and segregation contexts

机译:隔离会降低社会空间流动性吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The neighbourhood in which people live reflects their social class and preferences, so studying socio-spatial mobility between neighbourhood types gives insight into the openness of spatial class structures of societies and into the ability of people to leave disadvantaged neighbourhoods. In this paper we study the extent to which people move between different types of neighbourhoods by socio-economic status in different inequality and segregation contexts in four European countries: Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK (England and Wales), and Estonia. The study is based on population registers and census data for the 2001-2011 period. For England and Wales, which has long had high levels of income inequalities and high levels of socio-economic segregation, we find that levels of mobility between neighbourhood types are low and opportunities to move to more socio-economically advantaged neighbourhoods are modest. In Estonia, which used to be one of the most equal and least segregated countries in Europe, and now is one of the most unequal countries, we find high levels of mobility, but these reproduce segregation patterns and it is difficult to move to less deprived neighbourhoods for those in the most deprived neighbourhoods. In the Netherlands and Sweden, where income inequalities are the smallest, it is the easiest to move from the most deprived to less deprived neighbourhoods. The conclusion is that the combination of high levels of income inequalities and high levels of spatial segregation tend to lead to a vicious circle of segregation for low-income groups, where it is difficult to undertake upward socio-spatial mobility.
机译:人们所居住的社区反映了他们的社会阶层和偏好,因此研究社区类型之间的社会空间流动性可以洞悉社会空间阶层结构的开放性以及人们离开处境不利的社区的能力。在本文中,我们研究了四个欧洲国家(瑞典,荷兰,英国(英格兰和威尔士)和爱沙尼亚)中在不同的不平等和种族隔离背景下,人们在不同类型的社区之间的移动程度,其程度取决于社会经济状况。该研究基于2001-2011年期间的人口登记册和人口普查数据。对于长期以来一直存在较高的收入不平等和较高的社会经济隔离水平的英格兰和威尔士,我们发现邻里类型之间的流动性较低,而迁往社会经济优势更大的邻里的机会也很小。在爱沙尼亚,曾经是欧洲最平等和最隔离的国家之一,现在是最不平等的国家之一,我们发现流动性很高,但这些活动重现了种族隔离模式,很难转移到贫困程度较低的国家最贫困社区的居民区。在收入不平等最小的荷兰和瑞典,最容易从最贫困的地区迁往贫困程度较低的地区。结论是,高收入不平等和高水平的空间隔离往往会导致低收入群体的恶性隔离圈,难以实现向上的社会空间流动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号