...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Geography >STATE TRANSFORMATION, POLICY LEARNING, AND EXCLUSIVE DISPLACEMENT IN THE PROCESS OF URBAN REDEVELOPMENT IN TAIWAN
【24h】

STATE TRANSFORMATION, POLICY LEARNING, AND EXCLUSIVE DISPLACEMENT IN THE PROCESS OF URBAN REDEVELOPMENT IN TAIWAN

机译:台湾城市改造过程​​中的国家转型,政策学习和排他性位移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper explores the dynamics behind the changing regimes of urban renewal and its social impacts in Taiwan. Before the 1980s, the state was willing to solely shoulder the job of urban renewal with a wholly supportive financial budget and land appropriation law, while in the 1990s it became financially overburdened due to its renewal policy. Around the year 2000, the state turned towards promoting urban regeneration as a key business model. Through this historical exposition, the Taiwanese story of state transformation in urban renewal policy brings two issues to the fore. The first issue is the learning process concerning the policy of public-private partnership (PPP) initiatives. Trans-border policy mobility connects and constitutes cities, such as Taipei, with other places, such as London, through visits and seminars attended by policy makers and experts. However, policy transferred from abroad is "localized" in the learning process and used to prioritize the regeneration of public lands in the urban area. The PPP model is transformed in the face of domestic political struggles. The second issue is the social exclusion as a result of property-led regeneration. Rather than playing the role of an impartial institutional moderator, the state privileged landowners and developers and sacrificed the rights of tenants to stay put. By doing so, the state secures political support from landowner-cum-citizens and initiates a political culture of property in which local citizenship is predicated on ownership.
机译:本文探讨了不断变化的城市更新制度背后的动力及其在台湾的社会影响。在1980年代之前,该州只愿意全力支持财政预算和土地拨款法来承担城市更新的工作,而在1990年代,由于其更新政策,该州的财政负担过重。在2000年左右,国家将促进城市更新作为一种主要商业模式。通过这个历史性的论述,台湾关于城市更新政策中国家转型的故事引起了两个问题的关注。第一个问题是有关公私伙伴关系(PPP)举措政策的学习过程。通过政策制定者和专家参加的访问和研讨会,跨境政策流动性将台北等城市与伦敦等其他城市联系起来并构成城市。但是,从国外转移来的政策在学习过程中是“本地化”的,用于优先考虑市区内公共土地的再生。面对国内政治斗争,PPP模式发生了转变。第二个问题是财产主导的再生导致的社会排斥。国家没有扮演公正的机构主持人的角色,而是赋予了土地所有者和开发商以特权,并牺牲了租户保留住的权利。通过这样做,国家获得了土地所有者和公民的政治支持,并发起了一种财产文化政治,在这种文化中,当地公民的身份取决于所有权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号