首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >CITIES AND DIVERSITY: SHOULD WE WANT IT? CAN WE PLAN FOR IT?
【24h】

CITIES AND DIVERSITY: SHOULD WE WANT IT? CAN WE PLAN FOR IT?

机译:城市与多样性:我们应该吗?我们可以为此计划吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Diversity has become the new orthodoxy of city planning. The term has several meanings: a varied physical design, mixes of uses, an expanded public realm, and multiple social groupings exercising their "right to the city." Its impetus lies in the postmodernist/poststructuralist critique of modernism's master narratives and more specifically in reactions to the urban landscape created by segregation, urban renewal, massive housing projects, and highway building programs. Privileging diversity raises significant issues. Can planned environments produce diversity or only a "staged authenticity"? Does emphasizing diversity obscure the economic structure? Is there a connection between diversity and economic innovation? Does social diversity necessarily contribute to equity and a broadly satisfying public realm? Rather than setting diversity as the principal goal of city planning, I argue for the model of the just city, based on Nussbaum's concept of capacities and a recognition of the inevitable trade-offs among equity, diversity, growth, and sustainability.
机译:多样性已经成为城市规划的新正统观念。该术语具有多种含义:多种多样的外观设计,多种用途,扩展的公共领域,以及行使“城市权利”的多个社会团体。它的推动力在于对现代主义主要叙事的后现代主义/后结构主义批判,更具体地说,在于对隔离,城市更新,大规模住房项目和公路建设计划所产生的城市景观的反应。特权多样性引发了重大问题。计划的环境会产生多样性还是只能产生“阶段的真实性”?强调多样性会掩盖经济结构吗?多样性与经济创新之间有联系吗?社会多样性是否必然有助于公平和广泛满足的公共领域?我不是将多样性作为城市规划的主要目标,而是基于努斯鲍姆的能力概念以及对公平,多样性,增长和可持续性之间不可避免的权衡的认可,主张建立公正的城市模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号