首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Grappling with Governance: The Emergence of Business Improvement Districts in a National Capital
【24h】

Grappling with Governance: The Emergence of Business Improvement Districts in a National Capital

机译:与治理冲突:国家首都中出现的业务改进区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Business improvement districts (BIDs) constitute a relatively new mode of urban governance in which business and property owners pay surtaxes for collectivized, privatized maintenance and development services in their respective neighborhoods. Although they are typically considered an innovative means of improving urban areas-or at the very least a benign intervention of business owners to draw new consumers-the case of Washington, D.C., shows that BIDs are also an increasingly entrenched neo-liberal institution promoted by state restructuring and interurban competition. Given local conditions, such as a permissive legislative environment and fragmented governance, the proliferation, size, and influence of D.C.'s BIDs pose concerns about institutional accountability, socioeconomic inequality, and sustainability of services. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates urban governance theory, performance metrics, and interviews with BID and D.C. government officials, this study finds that Washington's BIDs have promoted revitalization but also pose concerns about limited public accountability, exacerbated socioeconomic and spatial inequalities, and further retreat of the municipal government.
机译:商业改善区(BID)构成了一种相对较新的城市治理模式,在这种模式中,商业和财产所有人为各自社区的集体化,私有化维护和开发服务支付附加费。尽管它们通常被认为是改善城市地区的创新手段,或者至少是企业主的良性干预以吸引新的消费者,但华盛顿特区的情况表明,BID也是由以下人士推动的,日益根深蒂固的新自由主义机构:国家重组和城市间竞争。考虑到当地条件,例如宽松的立法环境和支离破碎的治理,哥伦比亚特区BID的扩散,规模和影响引起对机构责任,社会经济不平等和服务可持续性的担忧。这项研究使用混合方法将城市治理理论,绩效指标以及与BID和DC政府官员的访谈相结合,发现华盛顿的BID促进了振兴,但也引起人们对有限的公共责任,加剧的社会经济和空间不平等以及进一步的担忧。市政府撤退。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号