首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >A dichotomous choice survey for quantifying option and non-use values of bus services in Korea
【24h】

A dichotomous choice survey for quantifying option and non-use values of bus services in Korea

机译:二分式选择调查,用于量化韩国公交服务的选择权和未使用价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The total economic value for a transportation service consists of use, option, and non-use value. The use benefit is based on a traveler's willingness to pay for usual consumption of the service. The optional value, on the other hand, is related to the possible use of the service for trips not yet anticipated or currently accommodated by other travel modes. The non-use value, however, is derived from the intrinsic merit of the service, even though a trip-maker never actually or potentially depends on the mode. A closed-ended contingent valuation method is considered for the quantification of the option and non-use values. A survey of single- and double-bounded dichotomous choices is conducted with a case study of South Korean bus operations. A logistic regression model and a survival analysis for the single- and double-bounded approaches, respectively, are applied. The estimation result is examined according to the statistical property required and the behavioral validity expected. In particular, three issues from the output are discussed. First, the results help to show the preferable framework between single- and double-bounded surveys for addressing an individual's option and non-use values. Second, the differences in the absolute values of option and non-use values are compared. Thirdly, the relationship between trip-makers' willingness to pay and the level of service of their primary travel modes are investigated. In conclusion, the summary of research and the possibilities for future studies are given.
机译:运输服务的总经济价值包括使用价值,选择价值和非使用价值。使用利益是基于旅行者愿意为该服务的常规消费付费的。另一方面,可选值与服务可能用于其他旅行模式尚未预计或当前提供的旅行有关。但是,即使旅行制造者从未真正或潜在地依赖于该模式,其非使用价值也来自该服务的内在价值。考虑采用封闭式或有估值法来量化期权和非使用价值。通过对韩国公交车运营的案例研究,对单界和双界选择进行了调查。分别应用了单边界法和双边界法的逻辑回归模型和生存分析。根据所需的统计属性和预期的行为有效性检查估计结果。特别是,讨论了输出中的三个问题。首先,结果有助于显示在单项和双项调查之间的可取框架,以解决个人的选择权和非使用价值。第二,比较期权和非使用值的绝对值之间的差异。第三,研究了出行者的支付意愿与其主要出行方式的服务水平之间的关系。总之,给出了研究的总结以及未来研究的可能性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation》 |2012年第1期|p.33-54|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Transportation Studies Group, Department of Environmental Planning, Seoul National University,1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea;

    Metropolitan Planning Research Group, Seoul Development Institute, 391 Seocho-dong, Seocho-gu,Seoul 137-071, Republic of Korea;

    Research Development, GRI Research Ltd., Hwankyeong Building,118 Jangchung-dong 1-Ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 100-391, Republic of Korea;

    Research Development, GRI Research Ltd., Hwankyeong Building,118 Jangchung-dong 1-Ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 100-391, Republic of Korea;

    Research Development, GRI Research Ltd., Hwankyeong Building,118 Jangchung-dong 1-Ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 100-391, Republic of Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    option value; non-use value; stated preference; contingent valuation methods; dichotomous choice; logistic regression model; survival analysis;

    机译:期权价值;非使用价值;陈述的偏好;或有估值方法;二分法选择;逻辑回归模型生存分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号