...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Assessing the effects of a mixed-mode design in a longitudinal household travel survey
【24h】

Assessing the effects of a mixed-mode design in a longitudinal household travel survey

机译:在家庭纵向旅行调查中评估混合模式设计的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The German Mobility Panel (MOP) is a national household travel survey, which has been collecting data on travel behavior in Germany since 1994. One of the MOP's central assets is its ability to provide time-series data on travel behavior. Thus, the comparability of survey results from different years is a major objective of the survey method used. Declining survey participation rates in the last decade in various socio-demographic groups resulted in the implementation of a mixed-mode design for the MOP in 2013, both for the sampling stage (landline and mobile phone recruitment) and the data collection stage (paper and web). In this study, we analyze whether the adaptations in the survey mode do indeed improve the results and, if so, why and to what degree. Ideally, the survey mode adaptions have increased the representativeness of the MOP. However, measurement biases due to the mixed-mode design are also conceivable. To decompose survey mode effects, we applied the propensity score weighting method. This method imputes the hypothetical responses participants would have given in different survey modes; disparities between actual responses and hypothetical responses under another mode are then traced back to the mixed-mode design. Our analysis indicates that trip-rate biases on shopping, leisure, and short trips are partly caused by the mixed-mode design; in contrast, quantities of time spent in the transportation system, trips made by car and public transportation, and commuting trips are hardly biased.
机译:德国出行专家组(MOP)是一项全国性的家庭出行调查,自1994年以来一直在收集有关德国出行行为的数据。MOP的主要资产之一是能够提供出行行为的时序数据。因此,不同年份调查结果的可比性是所使用调查方法的主要目标。过去十年来,各个社会人口群体的调查参与率下降,导致2013年在抽样阶段(固定电话和手机招募)和数据收集阶段(纸质和网络)。在这项研究中,我们分析了调查模式下的适应措施是否确实改善了结果,如果可以,原因和程度如何。理想情况下,调查模式的适应性提高了MOP的代表性。然而,由于混合模式设计而引起的测量偏差也是可以想到的。为了分解调查模式的影响,我们应用了倾向得分加权法。这种方法推论了参与者在不同调查模式下可能给出的假设反应。然后将实际响应与假设响应在另一种模式下的差异追溯到混合模式设计。我们的分析表明,购物,休闲和短途旅行的出行率偏差部分是由混合模式设计引起的。相反,在交通系统,汽车和公共交通出行以及通勤出行上花费的时间几乎没有偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号