...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Controllability of Partially Automated Driving functions - Does it matter whether drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel?
【24h】

Controllability of Partially Automated Driving functions - Does it matter whether drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel?

机译:部分自动驾驶功能的可控性-是否允许驾驶员将手从方向盘上移开不重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different motor vehicle manufacturers have recently introduced assistance systems that are capable of both longitudinal and lateral vehicle control, while the driver still has to be able to take over the vehicle control at all times (so-called Partial Automation). While these systems usually allow hands-free driving only for short time periods (e.g., 10 s), there has been little research whether allowing longer time periods of hands-off driving actually has a negative impact on driving safety in situations that the automation cannot handle alone. Altogether, two partially automated assistance systems, differing in the permitted hands-off intervals (Hands-off system vs. Hands-on system, n = 20 participants per assistance condition, age 25-70 years) were implemented in the driving simulation with a realistic take-over concept. The Hands-off system is defined by having a permitted hands-off interval of 120 s, while the Hands-on system is defined by a permitted hands-off interval of 10 s. Drivers' reactions at a functional system limit were tested under conditions of high ecological validity: while driving in a traffic jam, participants unexpectedly encountered a time-critical situation, consisting of a vehicle at standstill that appeared suddenly and required immediate action. A visual-auditory take-over request was issued to the drivers. Regardless of the hands-off interval, all participants brought the vehicle to a safe stop. In spite of a stronger brake reaction with the Hands-on system, no significant differences between assistance levels were found in brake reaction times and the criticality of the situation. The reason for this may be that most of the drivers kept contact with the steering wheel, even in the Hands-off condition. Neither age nor prior experience with ACC was found to impact the results. The study thus demonstrates that permitting longer periods of hands-off driving does not necessarily lead to performance deficits of the driver in the case of take-over situations, if a comprehensive take-over concept is implemented. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:不同的汽车制造商最近推出了能够同时进行纵向和横向车辆控制的辅助系统,而驾驶员仍然必须始终能够接管车辆控制(所谓的部分自动化)。虽然这些系统通常仅允许短时间段(例如10 s)的免提驾驶,但很少有研究是否允许较长的免提驾驶时间实际上在自动化无法解决的情况下对驾驶安全产生负面影响独自处理。在驾驶模拟中,共实现了两个部分自动化的辅助系统,它们在允许的放手间隔上有所不同(“放手”系统与“放手”系统,每种辅助条件n = 20位参与者,年龄在25-70岁之间),现实的接管概念。通过允许的转交间隔为120 s来定义自动转交系统,而通过允许的转交间隔为10 s来定义转交系统。在高度生态有效性的条件下测试了驾驶员在功能系统极限时的反应:在交通拥堵的情况下驾驶时,参与者意外地遇到了时间紧迫的情况,其中包括停顿的车辆突然出现并需要立即采取行动。向驾驶员发出了视觉听觉接管请求。无论交接间隔如何,所有参与者都将车辆安全停下。尽管动手系统的制动反应更强,但制动反应时间和情况危急程度之间的辅助级别之间没有发现显着差异。其原因可能是即使在“放手”状态下,大多数驾驶员仍保持与方向盘的接触。年龄和ACC的既往经验均未影响结果。因此,该研究表明,如果实施了全面的接管概念,那么在接管情况下,允许较长的自动驾驶时间并不一定会导致驾驶员的性能下降。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号