首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >A framework for robustness analysis of road networks for short term variations in supply
【24h】

A framework for robustness analysis of road networks for short term variations in supply

机译:用于短期供应变化的道路网络稳健性分析的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a growing awareness that road networks, are becoming more and more vulnerable to unforeseen disturbances like incidents and that measures need to be taken in order to make road networks more robust. In order to do this the following questions need to be addressed: How is robustness defined? Against which disturbances should the network be made robust? Which factors determine the robustness of a road network? What is the relationship between robustness, travel times and travel time reliability? Which indicators can be used to quantify robustness? How can these indicators be computed? This paper addresses these questions by developing a consistent framework for robustness in which a definition, terms related to robustness, indicators and an evaluation method are included. By doing this, policy makers and transportation analyst are offered a framework to discuss issues that are related to road network robustness and vulnerability which goes beyond the disconnected definitions, indicators and evaluation methods used so far in literature. Furthermore, the evaluation method that is presented for evaluating the robustness of the road network against short term variations in supply (like incidents) contributes to the problem of designing robust road networks because it has a relatively short computation time and it takes spillback effects and alternative routes into account.
机译:人们越来越认识到,道路网络越来越容易受到意外事件等不可预见的干扰,因此需要采取措施使道路网络更加坚固。为此,需要解决以下问题:如何定义健壮性?应对网络造成哪些干扰?哪些因素决定了路网的坚固性?鲁棒性,行程时间和行程时间可靠性之间是什么关系?哪些指标可用于量化鲁棒性?这些指标如何计算?本文通过建立一致的鲁棒性框架解决了这些问题,其中包括定义,与鲁棒性相关的术语,指标和评估方法。这样,政策制定者和交通分析人员将获得一个讨论与道路网络健壮性和脆弱性有关的问题的框架,这超出了迄今为止文献中所使用的不连贯的定义,指标和评估方法。此外,提出的用于针对短期供应变化(如事故)评估道路网络的稳健性的评估方法,由于其具有相对较短的计算时间,并且具有溢出效应和替代方法,因此会导致设计稳健的道路网络的问题。路线。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation Research》 |2012年第5期|p.828-842|共15页
  • 作者单位

    TNO, Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6, P.O. Box 49, 2600 AA Delft, The Netherlands,Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Ceosciences, Department of Transport and Planning, P.O. Box 5048,2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands,TRAIL Research School, Kluyverweg 4, P.O.Box 5017, 2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands;

    Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Ceosciences, Department of Transport and Planning, P.O. Box 5048,2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands,TRAIL Research School, Kluyverweg 4, P.O.Box 5017, 2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands,Hunan University, Faculty Civil Engineering, Changsha, PR China;

    TRAIL Research School, Kluyverweg 4, P.O.Box 5017, 2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands,Catholic University ofLeuven, CIB, Traffic & Infrastructure, Celestijnenlaan 300A B-3001, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    robustness; vulnerability; reliability; definitions; indicators; evaluation method;

    机译:健壮性脆弱性可靠性;定义;指标;评估方法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号