...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Gauging interventions for sustainable travel: A comparative study of travel attitudes in Berlin and London
【24h】

Gauging interventions for sustainable travel: A comparative study of travel attitudes in Berlin and London

机译:衡量可持续旅行的干预措施:柏林和伦敦旅行态度的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

So-called 'soft' policy instruments that respond to the psychological aspects of travel are regularly acknowledged as necessary complements to 'hard' infrastructure investments to effectively promote sustainable travel in cities. While studies investigating subjective orientations among travellers have proliferated, open questions remain including the role of recent technological advances, the expansion of alternative mobility services, locally specific mobility cultures and residential selection. This paper presents the methods, results and policy implications of a comparative study aiming to understand mobility attitudes and behaviours in the wider metropolitan regions of Berlin and London. We specifically considered information and communication technology (ICT), new types of mobility services such as car sharing, electric cars and residential preferences. In each region, we identified six comparable segments with distinct attitudinal profiles, socio-demographic properties and behavioural patterns. Geocoding of the home address of respondents further revealed varying contextual opportunities and constraints that are likely to influence travel attitudes. We find that there is significant potential for uptake of sustainable travel practices in both metropolitan regions, if policy interventions are designed and targeted in accordance with group-specific needs and preferences and respond to local conditions of mobility culture. We identify such interventions for each segment and region and conclude that comparative assessment of attitudinal, alongside geographical, characteristics of metropolitan travellers can provide better strategic input for realistic scenario-building and ex-ante assessment of sustainable transport policy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:人们通常认为,对旅行的心理方面做出反应的所谓“软”政策工具是对“硬”基础设施投资的有效补充,以有效促进城市的可持续旅行。虽然调查旅行者主观取向的研究激增,但仍存在悬而未决的问题,包括最近技术进步的作用,替代性出行服务的扩展,当地特定的出行文化和居住选择。本文介绍了一项旨在了解柏林和伦敦大都市地区的出行态度和行为的比较研究的方法,结果和政策含义。我们专门考虑了信息和通信技术(ICT),新型出行服务,例如汽车共享,电动汽车和居住偏好。在每个区域,我们确定了六个可比较的细分,这些细分具有不同的态度特征,社会人口统计学特征和行为方式。受访者家庭住址的地理编码进一步揭示了可能影响旅行态度的各种上下文机会和限制。我们发现,如果根据特定群体的需求和偏好设计和针对性的政策干预措施,并针对流动性文化的当地情况做出反应,则在两个大都市地区都有采用可持续旅行实践的巨大潜力。我们确定了针对每个细分市场和地区的此类干预措施,并得出结论,对都市旅客的态度和地理特征进行比较评估,可以为现实情景构建和事前评估可持续交通政策提供更好的战略投入。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号