首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Convenience, savings, or lifestyle? Distinct motivations and travel patterns of one-way and two-way carsharing members in Vancouver, Canada
【24h】

Convenience, savings, or lifestyle? Distinct motivations and travel patterns of one-way and two-way carsharing members in Vancouver, Canada

机译:方便,省钱还是生活方式?加拿大温哥华单向和双向汽车共享会员的不同动机和旅行方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carshare membership in North America has grown approximately 25% per year over the past decade. Some have attributed this to pro-environmental values and low-impact lifestyles of millennials, the primary users of carsharing. Many municipal governments have adopted this belief and support carsharing through various accommodations and subsidies. Results from a survey in Vancouver, Canada (which has the highest level of carsharing in North America) showed that one-way and two-way carsharing members have different motivations for carsharing and travel patterns. One-way members, primarily millennials, self-report that they carshare for convenience, using shared vehicles twice as frequently and private vehicles three times as frequently as two-way members. Two-way members choose carsharing for financial savings and a more efficient lifestyle. They tend to walk and bike more often than one-way members and the overall Vancouver population. These trip mode and frequency differences are consistent across age, gender, income, and geography. Perhaps as a consequence of the above, we also found that while one-way members are on average younger and wealthier, two-way members self-report as having more affordable lifestyles. These findings point to two-way carsharing members adhering to more efficient, sustainable lifestyles. Municipalities may consider these differences in motivations and trip patterns between one-way and two-way members of relevance in their carsharing policies.
机译:在过去十年中,北美的Carshare会员人数每年增长约25%。有些人将其归因于汽车共享的主要使用者千禧一代的环保价值观和低影响的生活方式。许多市政府都采纳了这一信念,并通过各种住宿和补贴来支持汽车共享。在加拿大温哥华进行的一项调查结果(北美的汽车共享水平最高)表明,单向和双向汽车共享成员在汽车共享和出行方式上有不同的动机。单向会员(主要是千禧一代)自我报告自己为方便起见与他人共享汽车,使用共享车辆的频率是双向会员的两倍,私人车辆的频率是双向会员的三倍。双向成员选择共享汽车,以节省金钱并提高生活方式的效率。他们往往比单行会员和整个温哥华人口更经常走路和骑自行车。这些出行方式和频率差异在年龄,性别,收入和地理位置之间是一致的。也许是由于上述原因,我们还发现,单向会员的平均年龄较年轻且较富有,而单向会员的自我报告为可负担得起的生活方式。这些发现表明双向汽车共享成员坚持更高效,可持续的生活方式。市政当局可能会考虑其单车共享政策中相关的单向和双向成员在动机和旅行方式上的这些差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation Research》 |2019年第6期|141-152|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada;

    Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada|Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC, Canada;

    Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号