首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Powering newly constructed vessels to comply with EGA regulations under fuel market prices uncertainty: Diesel or dual fuel engine?
【24h】

Powering newly constructed vessels to comply with EGA regulations under fuel market prices uncertainty: Diesel or dual fuel engine?

机译:在燃油市场价格不确定的情况下,为新建船舶提供动力以符合EGA法规:柴油还是双燃料发动机?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last decade, marine engine engineering has evolved considerably, to the point where engine technology can be considered mature and reliable using LNG as fuel without affecting safety at sea. This paper analyses the choice between diesel or dual engines jointly and considers the alternatives of installing or not installing a sulphur scrubber when building a new vessel. The dual engine is more flexible because it can consume liquefied natural gas (LNG) as other marine fuels but the initial investment is more expensive. On the other hand, the use of scrubbers enables the use of marine fuels with high sulphur content in Emission Control Areas (ECAs), these marine fuels are usually cheaper also we consider Selective Catalytic Reduction technology (SCR) in all cases to minimize NOx. The paper calibrates a stochastic model for LNG and determines four marine fuel correlated prices. The work also considers a possible regulatory change from a non ECA to an ECA in the future. When we aggregate the installation costs to the present value of the expected combustible cost under uncertainty we can select the cheapest alternative. We obtain a minimum of expected present value of investment and fuels cost of 25.62 million US$ with a Dual engine with scrubber configuration. Our work shows that, in the cases considered, the use of a dual engine is the best alternative minimizing the total of investment and fuel costs. Finally, we analyse the distribution of fuel cost and its associated risks.
机译:在过去的十年中,船用发动机工程已经取得了长足的发展,以至于使用LNG作为燃料而不会影响海上安全性的发动机技术可以被认为是成熟且可靠的。本文分析了联合使用柴油机还是双引擎的选择,并在建造新船时考虑了安装或不安装硫磺洗涤器的替代方案。双引擎更灵活,因为它可以像其他船用燃料一样消耗液化天然气(LNG),但初期投资更为昂贵。另一方面,使用洗涤塔可以在排放控制区(ECA)中使用高硫含量的船用燃料,这些船用燃料通常更便宜,我们在所有情况下都考虑采用选择性催化还原技术(SCR)来最大程度地减少NOx。本文对LNG的随机模型进行了校准,并确定了四个与海洋燃料相关的价格。这项工作还考虑了将来从非ECA到ECA的可能监管变化。当我们在不确定性下将安装成本汇总到预期可燃成本的现值时,我们可以选择最便宜的替代方法。采用双洗涤器配置的双引擎,我们获得的最低预期投资现值和燃油成本为2,562万美元。我们的工作表明,在所考虑的情况下,使用双引擎是最大程度地减少总投资和燃料成本的最佳选择。最后,我们分析了燃料成本的分布及其相关风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号