首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Record >Safety Evaluation of Centerline Rumble Strips: Crash and Driver Behavior Analysis
【24h】

Safety Evaluation of Centerline Rumble Strips: Crash and Driver Behavior Analysis

机译:中心线隆隆带的安全性评估:碰撞和驾驶员行为分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The effectiveness of centerline rumble strips in reducing cross-over-the-centerline crashes and improving the safety of undivided roadways was evaluated. Twenty U.S. states, along with several Canadian provinces, are currently using centerline rumble strips. A detailed analysis of crashes on State Routes 2, 20, and 88 in Massachusetts before and after installation of centerline rumble strips showed no significant change in crash frequencies; however, no fatal crashes have occurred on State Routes 2 and 88 since the installation of centerline rumble strips. Three cross-over-the-centerline fatal crashes did occur on State Route 20 after the centerline rumble strips were installed; centerline rumble strips were not a countermeasure to these specific crash types. Driver behavior at shoulder and centerline rumble strips was evaluated with a full-scale driving simulator. Drivers were found to react and correct the vehicle trajectory more quickly with centerline rumble strip encounters than with shoulder rumble strip encounters. About 27% of drivers made an initial leftward correction of their vehicles when encountering centerline rumble strips. Although this percentage may be inflated because of laboratory conditions, there is some probability of a driver confusing centerline rumble strips with shoulder rumble strips and reacting improperly. No improper (rightward) corrections were experienced with shoulder rumble strip scenarios. Centerline rumble strips were found to be effective at gaining drivers' attention and therefore to be an effective traffic control device and safety countermeasure in areas where a history of cross-over-the-centerline fatal and injury crashes occur.
机译:评估了中心线隆隆带在减少跨中心线碰撞和提高未分割道路安全性方面的有效性。美国20个州以及加拿大的几个省份目前都在使用中线隆隆声条。在安装中心线隆隆带前后,对马萨诸塞州2号,20号和88号州际公路上的撞车事故进行的详细分析显示,撞车频率没有明显变化。但是,自从安装中心线隆隆带以来,2号和88号州际公路上没有发生致命的车祸。在安装中心线隆隆声条之后,在20号州际公路上发生了三起跨越中心线的致命事故;中心线的隆隆声条并不是这些特定碰撞类型的对策。使用全面驾驶模拟器评估了驾驶员在肩膀和中线隆隆带上的行为。发现驾驶员在遇到中线隆隆声时比起肩部隆隆声时更能做出反应并更正车辆轨迹。遇到中心线隆隆声带时,约27%的驾驶员对其车辆进行了最初的向左校正。尽管由于实验室条件可能会夸大该百分比,但驾驶员仍有可能将中心线隆隆条与肩部隆隆条混淆并做出不适当的反应。肩部隆隆声脱扣情况未发生不正确的(向右)矫正。人们发现,中线隆隆声条可以有效地引起驾驶员的注意,因此,在发生过中线致命伤亡事故的地区,它是一种有效的交通控制装置和安全对策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号