首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Record >Control of Superpave Gyratory Compactor's Internal Angle of Gyration: Experience of the Utah Department of Transportation
【24h】

Control of Superpave Gyratory Compactor's Internal Angle of Gyration: Experience of the Utah Department of Transportation

机译:Superpave回转压实机内部回转角度的控制:犹他州交通部的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The State of Utah Department of Transportation started a program to use the dynamic angle validator (DAV) to measure the internal angle of all Superpave~® gyratory compactors (SGCs) used in the construction of hot-mix asphalt in the state. Results show that differences in internal angle exist unless the compactors are calibrated regularly and technicians are trained in laboratory procedures. Once the program was in place, the internal angle of 36 of the 46 SGCs tested was within the limits of 1.16° ± 0.03°. However, seven SGCs, all of one model, had angles between 0.860° and 1.212°, with an average angle of 1.026° even after calibration. If the limits are narrowed to 1.16° ± 0.02°, then only 28 of 46 (60%) of the SGCs will be within the range. Results also show that it is possible to obtain acceptable density values on specimens compacted using machines that have internal angles outside the proposed range. It was concluded that the internal angle limits of 1.16° ± 0.03° were too restrictive for the machines and types of mixes used in the state of Utah. It was recommended that the equipment be calibrated often, that molds be checked for cleanliness and dents, and that temperature measuring devices be verified. When large differences in measured properties of compacted samples remain even after repeated calibration, the internal angle should be verified because it was noted that external calibration did not always correct the internal angle. That will help reduce conflict between state labs and consultants.
机译:犹他州交通部启动了一个使用动态角度验证器(DAV)来测量该州用于热拌沥青施工的所有Superpave〜®旋转压实机(SGC)的内角的程序。结果表明,除非定期对压实机进行校准并且对技术人员进行实验室程序培训,否则内角存在差异。程序到位后,测试的46个SGC中的36个的内角在1.16°±0.03°的范围内。但是,七个SGC(均为一种模型)的角度在0.860°至1.212°之间,即使在校准后,平均角度也为1.026°。如果将限制范围缩小到1.16°±0.02°,则SGC中只有28个(46%)占60%。结果还表明,使用内角超出建议范围的机器压实的样品可以获得可接受的密度值。结论是,对于犹他州使用的机器和混合物类型,1.16°±0.03°的内角极限太过严格。建议经常对设备进行校准,检查模具的清洁度和凹痕,并验证温度测量设备。当即使在重复校准后,即使压实样品的测量性能仍存在较大差异时,也应验证内角,因为已注意到,外部校准并不总是能校正内角。这将有助于减少国家实验室与顾问之间的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号