首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Assessing inequalities on public transport affordability in two latin American cities: Montevideo (Uruguay) and Cordoba (Argentina)
【24h】

Assessing inequalities on public transport affordability in two latin American cities: Montevideo (Uruguay) and Cordoba (Argentina)

机译:评估两个拉丁美洲城市:蒙得维的亚(乌拉圭)和科尔多瓦(阿根廷)的公共交通负担能力不平等

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses public transport affordability inequities for Cordoba, Argentina, and Montevideo, Uruguay. In calculating public transport affordability, we consider two different criteria based on the "observed mobility" and the "potential mobility". Using household travel survey data, we estimate that on average, observed public transport affordability indexes are below 7% (6.2% in Cordoba and 3.8% in Montevideo). Nonetheless, for the lower quintile, this index reaches 11.7% in Cordoba and 6.4% in Montevideo. The observed affordability index is based on the expenditure on observed public transport trips, which does not consider those trips that, even when necessary, may not be performed due to financial restrictions. Because this measure underestimates financial constraints for the poorest groups, we propose to consider a new measure: potential affordability as an attempt into build a more realistic basket trip. It is computed considering motorized trip rates of the middle-class groups' as a benchmark. After analyzing potential affordability results, assessing its limitations and controlling by household composition we conclude that this is a very promising complementary measure since it helps to better understand the affordability gap for low-income groups. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文探讨了阿根廷科尔多瓦和乌拉圭蒙得维的亚的公共交通负担能力不平等。在计算公共交通的承受能力时,我们基于“观察到的流动性”和“潜在的流动性”考虑两个不同的标准。使用家庭旅行调查数据,我们估计观察到的公共交通承受能力指数平均低于7%(科尔多瓦为6.2%,蒙得维的亚为3.8%)。但是,对于较低的五分之一人口,该指数在科尔多瓦达到11.7%,在蒙得维的亚达到6.4%。观察到的负担能力指数是基于观察到的公共交通出行的支出得出的,该支出不考虑那些由于经济限制而即使在必要时也无法进行的出行。由于此措施低估了最贫困群体的财务困难,因此我们建议考虑一项新措施:潜在的承受能力,以尝试建立更现实的一揽子旅行。它是根据中产阶级的机动出行率来计算的。在分析了潜在的负担能力结果,评估其局限性并通过家庭组成进行控制之后,我们得出结论,这是非常有前途的补充措施,因为它有助于更​​好地了解低收入群体的负担能力差距。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号