首页> 外文会议>Annual transportation research forum >Public Transportation Challenges in America: What can we Learn from Mid-Size Cities in Latin America?
【24h】

Public Transportation Challenges in America: What can we Learn from Mid-Size Cities in Latin America?

机译:美国的公共交通挑战:我们可以从拉丁美洲的中型城市中学到什么?

获取原文

摘要

A "natural" consequence derived from personal income growth has been car ownership growth, but as far as there are some countries where this relation is not true, or at least, it is not at the same ratio as most cities in the USAa, we may go in depth analysis of the variables that influences such different choices. At the end we want to analyze how is car ownership and car use related to "quality" of life, for this we will consider time spent on daily traveling which then determines time available for other activities that usually makes our life more productive, as far as, we find more opportunities for personal leisure, social life, education, family activities and so on. Of course we know that time availability is not the only variable to be considered important but to the extent of this research it is. As a preliminary hypothesis, we consider that there are some variables related to consumer preferences on a broad range of goods which then determines if buying a car is among the most valuable options and on the other hand how is the built environment related to transit and how is then perceived the quality of the public transportation system. We consider from a heuristic approach that the built environment which I define as the Spatial Framework (SF) of the City and the Transportation Facilities Framework (TFF) induce car ownership, there ought to be some other variables that influences consumer preferences but the chosen variables are within our most immediate domain as Urban Planners. To assess the built environment-related to-transit quality we consider the following variables: a) Distance/Time, from Home to Work. b) Train, Subway, and/or Bus Station (BRT) distance from dwellings. c) Walkability around Main Origin and Destination Places. To assess the quality of public transportation we consider the following variables: a) Multi-Modal Connectivity b) Park&Ride Availability c) Non-Motorized Modes Availability We have chosen two cities (Quito-Ecuador and Medellin-Colombia), with a population of almost three million people, as case-study, and we will outline similarities and differences between them so that we can infer strategies focus on improving "quality" of life, by lessen car ownership rate, or diminishing its use, and at the same time, by improving transit modes, enhancing Time Value. Of course, land use planning and density management play a critical role too, for achieving success.
机译:个人收入增长带来的“自然”后果就是汽车拥有量的增长,但是就某些国家而言,这种关系是不正确的,或者至少与美国大多数城市的比例不一样,我们可能会深入分析影响此类不同选择的变量。最后,我们要分析汽车拥有量和汽车使用与生活“质量”之间的关系,为此,我们将考虑花费在日常旅行上的时间,然后确定可用于其他活动的时间,这些活动通常可以使我们的生活更加高效因此,我们发现了更多的个人休闲,社交生活,教育,家庭活动等机会。当然,我们知道时间可用性不是唯一被认为重要的变量,而是在本研究的范围内是重要的。作为一个初步的假设,我们认为存在一些与消费者对广泛商品的偏好有关的变量,这些变量随后决定了购买汽车是否是最有价值的选择之一,另一方面,建筑环境与运输的关系如何以及如何与之相关。然后就可以感觉到公共交通系统的质量。我们从启发式方法考虑,我定义为城市的空间框架(SF)和运输设施框架(TFF)的建筑环境会导致汽车拥有,应该有一些其他变量会影响消费者的偏好,但选择的变量在我们作为Urban Planners最直接的领域内。为了评估与建筑环境相关的过境质量,我们考虑以下变量:a)从家庭到工作的距离/时间。 b)距住宅的火车,地铁和/或汽车站(BRT)的距离。 c)在主要始发地和目的地附近的可步行性。为了评估公共交通的质量,我们考虑以下变量:a)多式联运b)停车和乘车的可用性c)非机动车方式的可用性我们选择了两个城市(基多-厄瓜多尔和麦德林-哥伦比亚),人口几乎作为案例研究的三百万人,我们将概述它们之间的异同,以便我们可以推断出战略重点在于通过减少汽车拥有率或减少其使用率来改善生活的“质量”,同时,通过改善运输方式,提高时间价值。当然,土地使用规划和密度管理对于取得成功也起着至关重要的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号